Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

More Trust and Cohesion for Secondary School Classes – Experiences of the Implementation of the Express Yourself! Programme in Four EU Countries

Aija Kettunen, Heidrun Kiessl, Katrin Neuhaus, Sakari Kainulainen, Niko Nummela, Terhi Salomaa, Meike Heinze

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 42–65 · Published 13 Mar 2021

10.9734/jesbs/2021/v34i130290

Abstract

Aim: The article describes and evaluates the implementation and impact of an inclusive grouping programme in the secondary school context, and how best practices can be established in different contextual and cultural conditions in Ireland, Germany, Lithuania, and Spain. The article is part of the Express Yourself! project and the European Union’s Erasmus+ Programme. Methodology: The theoretical framework of this study is based on the self-determination theory. Following the PDCA Cycle, the project team developed a programme scheme (fitting for the broader European context) based on an experienced Finnish model as well as a research perspective. The participating school types ranged from secondary public schools in cities to vocational schools in inclusive settings and gymnasiums with students (approx. 12-20 years) from mainly rural areas. The Express Yourself! sessions include five meetings of 60 to 120 minutes over several weeks. Each session focuses on a different topic, but building up on each other. The training was held in the facilities of the schools and mainly carried out by external pedagogical staff. A 3X10D questionnaire, mainly gathering data on the well-being of the participants (N=677), and a trainer questionnaire, focusing on the content on perception of the session content, were used for the analysis. Results: The article provides evidence that the Express Yourself! programme is a practical way of stimulating social inclusion in schools in different cultures and contexts. The research indicates a positive impact on students’ experienced overall well-being, especially in life-as-a-whole, managing daily activities, friends, and self-esteem. Deeper analysis of the results indicates that there were differences between the success of the project in cooperation countries. The main influencing factors were gender and age.  Conclusion: The Express Yourself! programme was experienced as a low threshold and effective way to positively influence students’ well-being and inclusion. Promising results were promoted by the motivation and cooperation between the trainers and teachers, which was indirectly reflected in the atmosphere in the class. Based on cooperation, sessions were tailored to the needs of each class.

Social inclusion students grouping formal education well-being self-expression dissemination social group work.

References (6)

  1. 1 Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. [DOI]
  2. 2 Protective Factors and Individual Resilience [DOI]
  3. 3 Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future.
  4. 4 Vulnerable but invincible: high‐risk children from birth to adulthood [DOI]
  5. 5 Von generellen Schutzfaktoren zu spezifischen protektiven Prozessen: konzeptuelle Grundlagen und Ergebnisse der Resilienzforschung
  6. 6 Evaluation of school-based life skills programmes in a high-risk sample: a controlled longitudinal multi-centre study [DOI]

Cited by 4

Uluslararası Öğrencilerin Kaynaşmasında Geleneksel Oyunların Rolü

Arzu ÖZYÜREK, Asya ÇETİN, Nagihan YILDIRIM · Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · 2023

Showing 1 of 4 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

8

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.