Machine Learning Models for Predicting Parkinson’s Disease Progression Using Longitudinal Data: A Systematic Review
Oluwabamise J. Adeniyi, Folasade Y. Ayankoya, Shade O. Kuyoro, Bright G. Akwaronwu, Ayodeji G. Abiodun
Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 274–294 · Published 21 Feb 2025
10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i3593Abstract
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various machine learning models in predicting PD progression using longitudinal data. Despite the increasing use of ML in PD research, gaps remain in understanding the impact of longitudinal data on prediction accuracy and model generalizability. This study aims to bridge this gap by examining how multimodal data sources, including clinical, genetic, and imaging datasets, contribute to improved predictive performance. The review focuses on the types of models used, data sources, performance metrics, and their potential to improve personalized treatment and clinical decision-making. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to identify relevant studies published from January 2010 to February 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies employing ML techniques for analyzing longitudinal PD data, yielding 14 eligible studies. Data were extracted on ML models used, dataset characteristics, performance metrics, and the integration of multimodal data sources such as clinical, genetic, and imaging data. The findings were synthesized to assess model performance and generalizability. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and ensemble methods like Random Forest and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) are effective in capturing disease progression with high accuracy and robust performance metrics. LSTM models achieved accuracies up to 90% and AUC scores of 93.79%, while LGBM models achieved 90.73% and AUC of 94.57%. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) scores in longitudinal studies increased over time, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) also improved. Integrating multimodal data, including clinical, genetic, and imaging information, further improved model reliability and generalizability. ML models, particularly those incorporating longitudinal and multimodal data, show promise in predicting PD progression. Future research should prioritize dataset diversity, enhance model interpretability, and leverage real-world wearable data for improved clinical applicability.
Cited by 11
Omid Zarei, Maryam Talebi moghaddam, Sadegh Moradi Vastegani · Brain Research Bulletin · 2026
Seema Gaba, Harpreet Kaur · 2025 3rd World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF) · 2025
Vasiliki Rizou, Nikos Grammalidis, Petros Daras · Scientific Reports · 2025
Masaru Tanaka · Cells · 2025
Bright G. Akwaronwu, Folasade Y. Ayankoya, Shade O. Kuyoro · Big Data Mining and Analytics · 2026
Showing 5 of 11 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Detecting Dental Caries through Captured Images Using the Machine Learning Technology Teachable Machine — shares topic coverage
- Prediction of Radiotherapy Dose Distribution for Glioblastoma Using Convolutional Neural Network Model — shares topic coverage
- A Systematic Literature Review of Machine Learning Methods in Healthcare — shares topic coverage
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review — shares topic coverage
- Artificial Intelligence in the Analysis of the Fetal Genome in Utero: A Critical Review of Current Paradigms, Clinical Utility and Future Horizons — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
7
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
11
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.