Learning Geometry in a Large-Enrollment Class: Do Tangrams Help in Developing Students’ Geometric Thinking?
Nyet Moi Siew, Sopiah Abdullah
Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 239–259 · Published 21 Jul 2012
10.9734/BJESBS/2012/1612Abstract
Aims: 1. To investigate the students’ levels of geometric thinking while engaging in in-class tangram activities in a large-enrollment class; 2. To find out the student’s perception towards the use of tangrams in learning geometry. Study Design: Case study research design. Place and Duration of Study: The study took place at the University of Malaysia Sabah for a period of three hours. Methodology: The sample consisted of 192 in-service primary school teachers (110 females and 82 males; age range 30-40 years). Student’s degree of acquisition of van Hiele (1986) geometric thinking was measured using an in-class tangram activity worksheet and analysed using acquisition scales of Gutiérrez et al. (1991). Questionnaires with closed and open-ended questions were conducted to explore learner’s insights and experiences of their learning. Results: The results showed that a majority of student’s attained complete acquisition of van Hiele level 1(88%) and level 2(82.3%). However, fewer than half (33.9%) of students could attain complete acquisition of level 3. These findings suggest that students developed through a sequence of hierarchical levels of thinking in learning geometry. Most of the students agreed that the tangram activities fostered their interest and appreciation towards geometry and boosted their confidence and creativity in learning geometry. The majority of them also agreed that tangram activities have enhanced their understanding of 2-D geometric concepts and the 3 levels of van Hiele model. All students hoped to implement this activity in their classrooms and promote it as recreation activities. Conclusion: Tangram activities carried out in a large class helped in-service primary school teachers develop sequentially from the visualisation level through to the informal deduction level. Structuring learners’ experiences using tangram and peer assessment not only served as an appropriate in-class exercise to facilitate students’ geometric thinking, but also develop confidence, interest and appreciation toward geometry.
Cited by 10
Turgay Demirel, Turkan Karakus Yilmaz · British Journal of Educational Technology · 2018
Inayet Dal Calisici, Nil Yildiz Duban · ESA Pub · 2025
Dereje Eshetu, Mulugeta Atnafu, Mulugeta Woldemichael · Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research · 2023
Aslı Erol, Asuman Seda Saracaloğlu, Beste Dinçer · Education & Youth Research · 2025
Venissa Dian Mawarsari, St. Budi Waluya, Nuriana Rachmani Dewi · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research · 2023
Yalçın Karalı, Haşim Taşkesen · İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · 2022
Venissa Dian Mawarsari, Rochmad, Eko Andy Purnomo · AIP Conference Proceedings · 2024
Aslıhan Ayar, Pinar Cavas · Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · 2024
Duygu DURULAN, Duriye ANGIN · Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · 2023
Faruk KORKMAZ, Mihriban HACISALİHOĞLU KARADENİZ · Journal of Computer and Education Research · 2023
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
26
Page views
0
PDF downloads
3
Outbound clicks
10
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.