My Experience with Levator Resection Surgery in Congenital Ptosis
Shubha Ghonsikar/Jhavar, Ranjana Bindu, Vilas Wangikar
Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal · pp. 1–6 · Published 28 Mar 2016
10.9734/OR/2016/24972Abstract
Aims: To assess the effectiveness of Levator resection surgery in patients with moderate to severe congenital ptosis with poor Levator function. Materials and Methods: Settings and Design: A prospective, observational, single institutional study done in 2003-2010 at a referral Government College draining poor patients. 52 eyes of 49 pts with moderate to severe ptosis were selected. All had poor Levator Palpebrae Superioris (LPS) action. Marcus Gunn ptosis and Acquired Ptosis were excluded. These underwent Levator resection surgery through skin approach. LPS was resected according to severity of ptosis. Postoperative ptosis correction, lid position, contour, lid lag and any other complications were noted. Results of ptosis correction were grouped as: 1. Good if postop. Lid height was within 1 mm of the desired height or with respect to the opposite lid. 2. Satisfactory if 1-2 mm undercorrection was seen. 3. Poor if > 2 mm undercorrection occurred or any other cosmetic blemish like lagophthalmos, notching of lid border or abnormal lid fold. Follow up was done at 1 wk, 6 wks, 6 mths, then yearly till 5 years. Results: 43 eyes (82.69%) showed good correction, with good primary eye lid position and no corneal complications. 7 eyes (13.46%) showed satisfactory correction. 2 eyes (3.84%) showed poor correction. 1- overcorrection, 1- undercorrection Conclusions: Levator resection surgery is an effective procedure of choice even for congenital ptosis with poor LPS action.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.