Examining the Decision-Making Process of Public Tendering and Acquisition -The Case of National Tender Board, Hargeisa, Somaliland

Abstract

This study investigates the decision-making processes within the Somaliland National Tender Board (SNTB) concerning public tendering and acquisition. Employing a quantitative approach and a comprehensive questionnaire survey, the research examines the impact of evaluation criteria, decision-making styles, and transparency levels on procurement outcomes. The findings underscore the critical role of transparency and accountability in ensuring equitable and efficient public procurement. Notably, the study identifies specific areas for improvement, including the need for enhanced standardization of evaluation criteria and the promotion of multi-criteria decision-making techniques. It is to acknowledge that this study relies on self-reported data from questionnaires. As such, the findings reflect the perceptions of the participants, and may be subject to biases associated with self-reported data. Due to limitations in access to procurement records and time constraints, this study did not involve a direct examination of the actual procurement processes. Future research could benefit from a mixed-methods approach that includes both quantitative surveys and qualitative analysis of procurement documents Given Somaliland's unique socio-political context and its ongoing efforts to build robust public institutions, this research holds significant implications for strengthening governance and promoting sustainable development. By providing empirical evidence on the factors influencing procurement outcomes, this study offers valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to optimize resource allocation, enhance transparency, and foster public trust. Ultimately, the findings contribute to the broader goal of improving public service delivery and promoting responsible fiscal management within Somaliland.