Insertion of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters by Exchange over the Guidewire and De Novo Puncture
Eslam Adel Ramadan El Shanshoury, Emad Mohammad Sallam, Mohammed Hamdy Abo-Ryia, Adel Husseiny Kamhawy
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 397–406 · Published 1 Aug 2022
10.9734/jammr/2022/v34i2031509Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters by de novo insertion technique and over the wire exchange technique Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients with ERSD in need for tunneled hemodialysis catheters insertion. Patients were divided into 2 groups (the first group) 22 de novo insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters and (the second group) 28 over the wire exchange. Patients were subjected to history taking, thorough clinical examination, routine preoperative investigations, preoperative and postoperative X-ray on the neck and chest and Duplex scan of neck veins on both sides. Results: In the de novo group, 11 patients were inserted by ultrasound guide and 11 patients were inserted by blind anatomical landmark technique in which the ultrasound guided technique showed lower rate of complications, while all over the wire group were inserted ultrasound guided. The primary patency was higher in the over the wire group(after 1 month=96%, after 3 months=89.2%, after 3 months=85.7%) than the de novo group(after 1m, 3m, 6m equals 86.3%,81.8%, 77.2% respectively) with non-significant P value 0.43, hematoma formation was higher in the de novo group with non-significant P value, 3 patients (13.6%) had infected catheters in the de novo group while 4 (14.3%) patients were affected in over the wire group, with 4 (18.2%) cases were malfunctioning in the de novo group while 3 (10.7) malfunctioning catheters in over the wire group with statistically non-significant P value in these values. There was significant difference between the 2 techniques in the operative time, for de novo insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters mean operative time was = 27.78 ± 5.71 minutes and in over the wire group the mean operative time was = 15.07 ± 1.98 minutes with statistically significant P value <0.001*. Conclusions: By comparison between the two methods of tunneled dialysis catheters insertion in ESRD patients (de novo insertion and over the wire exchange technique), we found that over the wire exchange technique can safe time, effort, reduce the rate of operative complication especially hematoma formation and at the same time it showed higher patency rate in comparison to de novo insertion method.
Cited by 1
Mohammad Zakriya, Nadeem Ahmed Siddiqui, Zia Ur Rehman · Annals of Vascular Surgery · 2025
Related research
- Guidewire for Retrograde Passive Dilatation of Ureter in Pediatric Patients with Urolithiasis: A Novel Technique from a Tertiary Center in Nepal — shares topic coverage
- A Case of Retained Guidewire Spontaneous Emerging from Skin Near Right Knee 8 Months after Central Venous Catheterization — shares topic coverage
- Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infections: Incidence in Temporary Catheters locked with Vancomycin and Heparin vs. Heparin-only — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
26
Page views
0
PDF downloads
2
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.