Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Impact of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Amended Organic Manure on Arachis hypogaea Growth Response and Rhizosphere Bacterial Community

Progress Oghenerume, Samuel Eduok, Basil Ita, Ofonime John, Inemesit Basssy

International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 24–35 · Published 24 May 2020

10.9734/ijpss/2020/v32i530279

Abstract

The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticle-organic manure amended ultisol and loam soils on plant growth response and rhizosphere bacterial community of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was evaluated using standard methods under greenhouse conditions. Results indicate germination rates ranged between 30 and 100% in the amended soils compared to 50 and 70% in the controls. ZnO nanoparticles exerted concentration-dependent and varying effects on the plant root and shoot lengths, weights, nodules and pod formation in the two soil types. Heterotrophic bacterial counts ranged from 7.21 ± 0.51 to 7.38 ± 0.5 Log10CFUg-1 in the amended ultisol and 6.99 ± 0.55 Log10CFUg-1 in the control with a log reduction to 6.70 ± 0.39 Log10CFUg-1 in 500 mgkg⁻¹ ZnO spiked soil. Counts in the amended loam soil ranged between 6.59 ± 0.48 and 7.22 ± 0.41 Log10CFUg-1 relative to 6.80 ± 0.58 Log10CFUg-1 in the control. ZnO induced concentration-dependent effect on oxygen uptake rate relative to the controls. The organisms were members of the genera Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium, Xanthobacter, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Nitrosomonas and Agromyces. ZnO nanoparticle exerted concentration-dependent stimulatory and inhibitory effects on the plant growth response, oxygen uptake rate and induced temporal shifts in soil microbial abundance. It is challenging to generalize a consistent response of the plant or microorganisms because ZnO nanoparticles interacted with A. hypogaea and soil bacterial community in ways that differ in the ultisol and loam soil.

ZnO nanoparticles ultisol loam soil Arachis hypogaea.

Cited by 8

Nano Fertilizers for Precision Agriculture

Akhila Sen, P. Faseela, Julie Jacob · Nanotechnology in Plant Sciences · 2025

Unraveling Nanofertilizers' Influence on Soil Microbial Communities in Mustard‐Pearl Millet Cropping Systems

Pravin Kumar Upadhyay, Abir Dey, Vinod Kumar Singh · Land Degradation & Development · 2025

How nanofertilizers affect soil microbial communities?

Hemraj Chhipa, Lobna Hajji-Hedfi · Nanofertilizer Delivery, Effects and Application Methods · 2024

From cultivation to Consumption: Evaluating the effects of nano fertilizers on food quality and safety

Monika Stojanova, Sani Demiri, Marina T. Stojanova · Advanced Agrochem · 2025

GROWTH AND YIELD RESPONSES OF SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.) TO ZINC OXIDE (ZnO) NANOPARTICLES FOLIAR APPLICATION

Department of Chemistry, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi. Nigeria, Fayomi Omotola Michael · Biotechnologia Acta · 2024

Plant–microbes–nanofertilizers and their interactions for plant growth promotion and stress management

Geeta Bhandari, Shalu Chaudhary, Parul Chaudhary · Nano-bioinoculants · 2025

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer on Crop Plant Growth and Its Effect on Rhizospheric Microorganism and Its Application

Santosh Kumar Sethi, Smita Rani Dalei, Augustine Okpani Oko · Advances in Chemical and Materials Engineering · 2024

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

8

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.