Impact of Surgery in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer after Systemic Disease Control
Rufina Soomro, Afsheen Javaid Khokher, Naila Zahid
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 153–161 · Published 19 Nov 2021
10.9734/jammr/2021/v33i2231167Abstract
Background: Systemic chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic breast cancer, with an undecided role in surgery. Limited data is available for the role of surgery on the overall survival of stage 4 breast cancer regarding luminal subtypes of patients. This is a retrospective data analysis comparing overall survival benefit and disease-free survival in stage IV breast cancer after systemic treatment and systemic disease control concerning luminal classification in the last five years. Method: Patients who had surgery and no surgery after systemic treatment and disease control were compared for 5 years overall survival as the primary endpoint and disease-free survival as the secondary endpoint. The survival benefit was also compared regarding tumor biology (ER/PR, HER2 status). Results: Data included 421 patients, 237 in surgery and 184 in no surgery group. At one year survival for surgery performed and not performed was not significant. Five-year overall survival for surgery performed and not performed was 84.4% and 74.5%. A statistically significant difference in survival rates was observed (p<0.0001). The mortality rate was 15.6% in surgery performed and 25.5% in the no-surgery group which showed a significant difference among the two study groups (p=0.011). We found statistically significant differences in luminal B (p=0.004) and triple-negative breast cancer patients (p=0.001) for survival rates in surgery performed and not performed groups. Disease-free survival has shown no significant difference in surgery performed and not performed group in 1, 2, and 5 years follow-up. Conclusion: Surgery has a positive impact on overall survival in Stage 4 patients with systemic disease control even in high-risk luminal B, Her 2 Positive, and triple-negative breast cancer patients. There was no significant difference observed in disease-free survival who were operated on or not. However, there was no local recurrence in the operated group.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Three Cycles versus Six Cycles of Neoajuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II and III Breast Cancer: 3 Years Overview — shares topic coverage
- A Prospective Observational Study of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Inoperable Patients of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer — shares topic coverage
- De-escalating the Axilla: A Systematic Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Reliability and Oncological Safety in the Post-Neoadjuvant Landscape — shares topic coverage
- Induction Chemotherapy as a Predictor for Definitive Treatment in Bulky Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Schedule More Suited to Sub Himalayan Region — shares topic coverage
- The Peritoneal Paradox: Deciphering the Conflicting Evidence for HIPEC in Primary Versus Recurrent Ovarian Cancer — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.