Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Impact of Cooking Conditions on Proximate Composition and Textural Properties of Chicken Breast Meat

Samson Ugochukwu Alugwu, Thomas M. Okonkwo, Michael O. Ngadi

European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety · pp. 14–30 · Published 17 May 2023

10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i61313

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cooking conditions on proximate composition and textural properties (cohesiveness and chewiness) of chicken breast meat.  Eight packs of industrial skinless chicken breast meat were cooked by air frying (AF), baking (BK), deep fat frying (DF) and grilling (GR) at 170, 180 and 190oC for 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 min. The chicken breast packs were frozen and sliced into dimensions, thawed, cooked and analysed by a two way analysis of variance. The results revealed that cooking methods significantly (p < 0.05) decreased moisture and protein contents from 75.14 to 58.25 % and 89.17 to 82.98 %, but increased fat content from 4.26 to 7.78 %, ash content from 1.95 to 2.39 %, carbohydrate content from 4.63 to 6.95 %, cohesiveness content from 0.40 to 0.52 and chewiness value from 3.63 to 6.05 kg. An increases in cooking temperatures and times decreased  moisture  content  from  60.58 to 56.34 % and 75.14 to 47.40 % and protein content from 83.77 to 82.11 % and 89.17 to 79.45 %. Similarly, increases in cooking temperatures and times significantly (p < 0.05) increased fat content from 7.00 to 8.44 % and 4.26 to 10.12 %, ash content from 2.15 % to 2.59 % and 1.95 to 2.67 %. This study showed that increases in cooking temperatures decreased non-significantly (p > 0.05) carbohydrate content from 7.02 to 6.92 %, but increases in cooking times increased carbohydrate content from 4.63 to 7.76 %. An increases in cooking temperatures and times increased cohesiveness content from 0.50 to 0.54 and 0.40 to 0.63, chewiness value from 5.50 to 6.77 kg and 3.63 to 8.54 kg, respectively. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in chewiness values of samples cooked by AF and GR methods. The best cooking method/ temperature / time for low nutrient losses was BK, 170oC and 4 min.

Chicken breast cooking conditions proximate composition cohesiveness chewiness

References (11)

  1. 1 TEXTURE PROFILE ANALYSIS
  2. 2 Bioaccessibility of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Zn, and crude protein in beef, pork and chicken after thermal processing [DOI]
  3. 3 Use of near infrared transmittance spectroscopy to predict fatty acid composition of chicken meat [DOI]
  4. 4 Effect of Different Frying Methods on Cooking Yield, Tenderness and Sensory Properties of Chicken Breast Meat [DOI]
  5. 5 Kinetics of change in quality parameters of khaja during deep‐fat frying [DOI]
  6. 6 Effect of Thermal Treatments on Selected Minerals and Water Soluble Vitamins of Chicken Breast Meat [DOI]
  7. 7 Validation of feasibility and quality of chicken breast meat cooked under various water‐cooking conditions [DOI]
  8. 8 Nutritive value of fresh and brackish water catfish as a function of size and processing methods [DOI]
  9. 9 Heat and Mass Transfer During Frying [DOI]
  10. 10 Official Methods of Analysis [DOI]
  11. 11 Food texture and viscosity—concept and measurement, [DOI]

Cited by 3

Influence of Thermal Treatments on Textural and Rheological Properties of Different Types of Meatballs

Luiza-Andreea Tănase (Butnariu), Doina-Georgeta Andronoiu, Oana-Viorela Nistor · Processes · 2025

Showing 1 of 3 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

65

Page views

0

PDF downloads

25

Outbound clicks

3

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.