Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Barriers and Facilitators of Adherence in User-Dependent HIV Prevention Trials, a Systematic Review

Julie Ambia, Kawango Agot

International STD Research & Reviews · pp. 12–29 · Published 24 May 2013

10.9734/ISRR/2013/3531

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal adherence to investigational products has been associated with ineffectual outcomes in clinical trials. This review provides a summary of factors that influenced adherence in HIV prevention trials. Method: Our search included user-dependent trials that focused on sexual transmission of HIV. MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Knowledge v5.6, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched as of August, 2012 and HIV/AIDS conference abstracts, March 2013. Results: Twenty four HIV prevention trials were included. Main barriers related to adherence included; pregnancies, mobility and relocation from study area, adherence declining overtime as a result of fatigue, stigma and negative rumors about the clinical trials, and gel volume to be inserted perceived as too much. Other reported barriers were side effects, alcohol use, running out of study product after missing clinic visits, pill/gel sharing, forgetting to take/use study product, unplanned sex (in studies with coital-dependent dosing), concealing trial participation from partner, difficulty in sustaining high adherence levels in study products with a short half-life of 1-3 hours, and simultaneous use of multiple products. Key facilitators of adherence included; male involvement in trial related activities or disclosure of study participation to male partner, product acceptability, older age (>25 years), and high risk perception of HIV. Other facilitators were; routinizing pill taking, perceived enhancement of male partner’s sexual pleasure, adequate supply of study product, good staff-participant relationship, less education, unannounced adherence support visits, and no overt side effects experienced as reported by participants. Conclusion: Information on investigational prevention products should be packaged and delivered in ways that appeal to realities of participants’ lives while remaining scientifically factual. Trials should customize adherence messages to address difficulties with study product use and prioritize community engagement to respond to issues around stigma, rumors and potential partner concerns. Additionally, efforts towards increasing HIV risk perception are central to optimizing adherence.

Suboptimal adherence HIV clinical trials Africa phase II/III trials biomedical HIV trials

Cited by 9

Perspectives on use of oral and vaginal antiretrovirals for HIV prevention: the VOICE‐C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa

Ariane van der Straten, Jonathan Stadler, Ellen Luecke · Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2014

Adherence to Preexposure Prophylaxis: Current, Emerging, and Anticipated Bases of Evidence

K. Rivet Amico, Michael J. Stirratt · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2014

Study Product Adherence Measurement in the iPrEx Placebo-Controlled Trial

K. Rivet Amico, Julia L. Marcus, Vanessa McMahan · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · 2014

Sharing of Investigational Drug Among Participants in the Voice Trial

Jeeva Moodley, Sarita Naidoo, Jayajothi Moodley · AIDS and Behavior · 2016

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

9

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.