Influence of Environmental Factors on Photosynthesis of Three Coniferous Species
Galina Suvorova, Michael Korzukhin, Maria Ivanova
Annual Research & Review in Biology · pp. 1–14 · Published 25 Apr 2017
10.9734/ARRB/2017/31526Abstract
The effect of five ecological factors (incident radiation, air and soil temperature, vapour pressure deficit (D), and soil moisture) on the net CO2 photosynthesis rate was examined for three boreal tree species – Siberian larch (Larix sibirica), Sibirian spruce (Picea obovata), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) from the Baikal lake region, by means of a coupled photosynthesis–stomatal conductance model. The model was parametrized on the data obtained from 5–year long field measurements made on sun needles of three 14–19 year-old trees of each species. Pine had the greatest photosynthesis rate while spruce had the lowest one. There were 9 free model parameters in total fitted on the whole data set that gave the model efficiency ME = 0.46–0.66. For single years and three intra–year time intervals, parameter fitting was made for three key parameters only: maximum Rubisco activity, Vcmax25, maximum stomatal conductance,, and quantum efficiency of photosynthesis, φ; this procedure raised fitting quality to ME = 0.61–0.72. Photosynthesis rate varies due to current weather conditions and also due to long-term changes in the plant itself, that is in the parameters that determine the photosynthesis rate. The change of parameter values with time probably takes place due to between– and within–year weather change. Under actual weather conditions in Pre-Baikalia, larch realises 49%, spruce – 30%, аnd pine – 36% of their maximum photosynthesis rate ability. Soil moisture significantly affected Vcmax25 for larch and spruce, while for larch it was vapour pressure deficit (D) that most affected the value of Vcmax25. The coefficient of stomatal limitation of photosynthesis, Ls, offered by Sharkey, showed that stomatal regulation is maximal for pine, and minimal for larch.
Cited by 7
Xingyue Li, Dayong Fan, Zhengxiao Liu · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · 2023
N. E. Korotaeva, M. V. Ivanova, G. G. Suvorova · Journal of Forestry Research · 2017
L. I. Agafonov, M. A. Gurskaya, V. V. Kukarskih · Russian Journal of Ecology · 2021
Olga Vladimirovna Kalugina, Tatiana Alekseevna Mikhailova, Larisa Vladimirovna Afanasyeva · Ecotoxicology · 2021
G. F. Antonova, V. V. Stasova, V. A. Oskolkov · Russian Journal of Developmental Biology · 2025
Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, V. N. Shanin, Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity of the Russian Academy of Sciences · FOREST SCIENCE ISSUES · 2023
Olga Vladimirovna Kalugina, Larisa Vladimirovna Afanaseva · Ecotoxicology · 2025
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
7
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.