Smartphone Addiction among University Undergraduates: A Literature Review
Hafidha Suleiman Al-Barashdi, Abdelmajid Bouazza, Naeema H. Jabur
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 210–225 · Published 11 Oct 2014
10.9734/JSRR/2015/12245Abstract
Purpose: This paper reviews the growing literature on Smartphone addiction among university undergraduates to identify trends. Design/Methodological Approach: It is based on literature published during the period 1996-2013. Only original research papers have been included in this literature review. The thematic structure has been adopted. In the beginning, such concepts as the symptoms and levels of this addiction will be clarified. Afterwards, the underlying problems and methodological issues raised in the literature will be touched upon. The paper also reviews the relationship between Smartphone addiction among undergraduates and their academic achievement. Finally, significant differences in addiction among undergraduates according to their gender, field of study, parents educational level and family income level will be examined. Findings: While some studies have shown gender differences in Smartphone addictive use, others have proved that gender and Smartphone use are not significantly related. A few studies have examined the relationship between addiction and students' field of study. Some of these have found that humanities students have a higher addiction level than physical science students. So far, little is known about the extent of the relationship between socio-economic factors (such as parental education and family income), mobile phone use behavior and addiction among university students. The results regarding Smartphone usage and family income had showed contrary indications. Nor is there agreement about the results regarding Smartphone use and parental education. Practical Implications: This state-of-art is useful for researchers and practitioners for understanding current trends and problems and methodological issues. Originality/Value: This paper identifies trends and problems and methodological issues. Conclusion: A mixed-approach investigation consisting of both quantitative and qualitative method is recommended to provide a comprehensive understanding of addiction and its impact on students' academic achievement.
Cited by 20
Khaled Ahmad Alkandari, Muhammad Khaled Al-Alawneh · International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research · 2019
Maria Panagiotidi, Paul Overton · Current Psychology · 2020
Julia Machado Khoury, Maila de Castro Lourenço das Neves, Marco Antônio Valente Roque · Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy · 2019
Fachrul Ahyar Nasution, Mustafa M. Amin, Elmeida Effendy · Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences · 2022
Abdulrahman Al-Mohaimeed, Mansour Alharbi, Ilias Mahmud · 2022
Saeed Imani, Jaber Alizadeh Goradel, Sadegh Mousavi · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences · 2019
Ashek Mahmud, M. Rezaul Islam · SN Social Sciences · 2023
Suliman S. Aljomaa, Mohammad F. Al.Qudah, Ismael S. Albursan · Computers in Human Behavior · 2016
Sarah Hattab, Manal Badrasawi, Ola Anabtawi · Scientific Reports · 2022
Aslı Kartol, Servet Üztemur · British Journal of Guidance & Counselling · 2025
Related research
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
20
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.