Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Coffee Production Challenges and Opportunities in Tanzania: The Case Study of Coffee Farmers in Iwindi, Msia and Lwati Villages in Mbeya Region

Hillary M. O. Otieno, Beryle A. Alwenge, Oliver Otieno Okumu

Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research · pp. 1–14 · Published 20 Feb 2019

10.9734/ajahr/2019/v3i229993

Abstract

Coffee is one of the most popular cash crops grown in Tanzania. However, its productivity has remained low due to various biotic, abiotic and socio-economic factors prevailing in Mbeya Region. These production challenges have never been properly and intensively documented for better decision making. Therefore, this study was set to assess and provide a better understanding of the current production situation and available technologies and practices for enhancing coffee production in the region. The research was carried out in Iwindi, Msia and Lwati villages located in Mbeya Region. Two sources of data were used; (a) primary data collected through focus group discussion; and (b) secondary data collected through a systematic and intensive process that involved searching and collecting relevant publications. From the research, farmers were found to grow very old trees that were more than 20 years. The soils were found to have low levels of nutrients and organic matter. Soils are also acidic, a pH below 5.5. High prevalence of pests such as coffee berry and stem borers and diseases like coffee leaf rust, Fusarium spp., bacterial blight, and red blister were reported in the region. Poor agronomic practices involving intensive intercropping of coffee with trees, other food crops like banana, beans and using generally low tree densities per hectare was observed. Poor extension services due to unbalanced extension agent to farmer ratio (about 1:1800) were found to be one of the causes for poor adoption of best coffee agronomy. Lack of market information and low coffee prices were found to demoralize farmers as it leads to a low return on investment. When asked about their ‘priority training and input support requirements’, all farmers mentioned best coffee agronomy and fertilizer use training. They also mentioned fertilizers (especially Urea or Yara Mila Java blend products) and pesticides (for berry borer, stem borer, Coffee berry disease, and coffee leaf rust) inputs as key for better yields. All these inputs and training require money and service provider. Bundling of training and inputs together could make it easier for any service provider to help farmers increase their yields.

Coffee coffee stem and berry borer coffee berry disease; coffee leaf rust disease production challenges Mbeya Region soil fertility management pest and disease management.

Cited by 20

Assessment of avocado grafting practices and propagules quality against minimum certification standards in Tanzania

Nugwa F. Bugudole, Emmanuely Z. Nungula, Newton Kilasi · Cogent Food & Agriculture · 2025

In-Depth Assessment of Key Factors Affecting Coffee Production in Tanzania

Raphael Mbunduki · International Journal of Agricultural Economics · 2024

“Crisis in the Cup:” Unveiling the Hazards and Vulnerabilities of the Philippine Coffee Supply Amidst Emerging Risks

Ivee V. Fuerzas, Laurence L. Delina, Kim‐Pong Tam · Sustainable Development · 2025

Seaweed biosecurity in Tanzania: Lessons to be learned from other major plant crops

Msafiri A. Ndawala, Flower E. Msuya, Jennefe P. Cabarubias · Environmental Challenges · 2021

Coffee substitutes: A review of the technology, characteristics, application, and future perspective

Sima Tahmouzi, Sara Sanaei Nasab, Behnam Alizadeh‐Salmani · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · 2024

A List of Scale Insect Agricultural Pests

Takumasa Kondo, Gillian W. Watson · Encyclopedia of Scale Insect Pests · 2022

Showing 19 of 20 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

20

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.