Coffee Production Challenges and Opportunities in Tanzania: The Case Study of Coffee Farmers in Iwindi, Msia and Lwati Villages in Mbeya Region
Hillary M. O. Otieno, Beryle A. Alwenge, Oliver Otieno Okumu
Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research · pp. 1–14 · Published 20 Feb 2019
10.9734/ajahr/2019/v3i229993Abstract
Coffee is one of the most popular cash crops grown in Tanzania. However, its productivity has remained low due to various biotic, abiotic and socio-economic factors prevailing in Mbeya Region. These production challenges have never been properly and intensively documented for better decision making. Therefore, this study was set to assess and provide a better understanding of the current production situation and available technologies and practices for enhancing coffee production in the region. The research was carried out in Iwindi, Msia and Lwati villages located in Mbeya Region. Two sources of data were used; (a) primary data collected through focus group discussion; and (b) secondary data collected through a systematic and intensive process that involved searching and collecting relevant publications. From the research, farmers were found to grow very old trees that were more than 20 years. The soils were found to have low levels of nutrients and organic matter. Soils are also acidic, a pH below 5.5. High prevalence of pests such as coffee berry and stem borers and diseases like coffee leaf rust, Fusarium spp., bacterial blight, and red blister were reported in the region. Poor agronomic practices involving intensive intercropping of coffee with trees, other food crops like banana, beans and using generally low tree densities per hectare was observed. Poor extension services due to unbalanced extension agent to farmer ratio (about 1:1800) were found to be one of the causes for poor adoption of best coffee agronomy. Lack of market information and low coffee prices were found to demoralize farmers as it leads to a low return on investment. When asked about their ‘priority training and input support requirements’, all farmers mentioned best coffee agronomy and fertilizer use training. They also mentioned fertilizers (especially Urea or Yara Mila Java blend products) and pesticides (for berry borer, stem borer, Coffee berry disease, and coffee leaf rust) inputs as key for better yields. All these inputs and training require money and service provider. Bundling of training and inputs together could make it easier for any service provider to help farmers increase their yields.
Cited by 20
Joseph Rajabu Kangile, Reuben M. J. Kadigi, Charles Peter Mgeni · Agriculture · 2021
Beatrice Alela, Enos Katya Kule, Dick Chune Midamba · Cogent Social Sciences · 2024
François Essouma Manga, Nsangou Kone Nourou Abdou, Alain Heu · International Journal of Pest Management · 2025
Johnson Nason Katabwa, Dorence Martine Kalemile · African Journal of Empirical Research · 2026
Vincent Canwat · Sustainable Development · 2022
Carlos Javier Reyes-Pilay, Luis Alberto Duicela-Guambi, Osvaldo Alberto Fosado-Téllez · 2024
Bright Necton, Edward Ssemakula, Nkuuhe Douglas · International Journal of Agricultural Economics · 2025
Anastase Harelimana, Daniel Rukazambuga, Thierry Hance · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection · 2022
Adrian Jackob Karia, Juma Said Ally, Stanley Leonard · African Journal of Empirical Research · 2025
Lalita Randive, Shubhangi Sapkal, Deepak Bornare · EPJ Web of Conferences · 2025
Showing 19 of 20 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Effect of Particle Size on Color of Ground Coffee — shares topic coverage
- Aspergillus Producing-Ochratoxin A During Coffee Processing in Cameroon: A Short Literature Review and Analysis — shares topic coverage
- Value Chain Analysis of Ethiopian Coffee (Coffea arabica) — shares topic coverage
- Coffee in Indian Economy: Performance and Prospects — shares topic coverage
- Comparison of Aluminum and Iron Electrodes for COD Reduction from Coffee Processing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Process — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
20
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.