Efficacy of Myofascial Release Therapy on Pain, Mobility and Function in Patients with Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Syed Rais Akhter Rizvi, Shailendra Mehta
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 118–125 · Published 10 Sep 2025
10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i95932Abstract
Background: Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder affecting quality of life and functional independence. Nonspecific neck pain, which manifests as simple neck discomfort without a clearly identifiable underlying cause and often arises from postural or mechanical stressors, is the most prevalent type observed in clinical practice. Myofascial release therapy (MFR) has emerged as a manual therapy technique aimed at reducing fascial restrictions and improving mobility. Objective: The present study evaluates the efficacy of MFR in reducing pain, improving cervical range of motion (CROM), and enhancing functional outcomes in individuals with NSNP. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at KTG Mult speciality Hospital on 30 participants aged 25–50 years with NSNP persisting for more than 3 months. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: MFR Group (n = 15) and Control Group receiving Sham MFR and Symptom specific exercises (n = 15). Both groups received the same interventions in terms of the symptom specific exercise and electrotherapy, the only difference being that the MFR group received Myofascial Release where-as the control group received sham Myofascial release. Interventions were delivered thrice weekly for 3 weeks. Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), functional disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI), and Cervical Range of Motion were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The MFR group showed significantly greater improvements in VAS (mean reduction 4.2 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), NDI (mean reduction 18.4 ± 5.2 vs. 8.9 ± 4.6, p < 0.001), and CROM (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation; all p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Conclusion: MFR was more effective than conventional stretching in reducing pain, enhancing CROM, and improving functional outcomes in NSNP. Incorporating MFR into physiotherapy protocols may provide additional clinical benefits.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Mechanisms of Recovery in Cervicogenic Headache: Mediating Effects of Cervical Mobility on Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life Following Manual Therapy — shares topic coverage
- Effectiveness of Myofascial Release, Cryostretch and Kinesiotaping in Adoloscents with Trapizitis — shares topic coverage
- Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilisation and Myofascial Release Applied to the Hamstrings in Cerebral Palsy: A Critical Narrative Review of Mechanistic Claims, Comparative Evidence and the Untested Link to Sitting Balance — shares topic coverage
- Comparative Study of Stretching of Foot & Hip Muscles along with Myofascial Release (MFR) V/S Strengthening of Foot & Hip Muscles along with MFR for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis — shares topic coverage
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Large Scale Systematic and Explicit Language and Literacy Intervention in Danish Daycares: The SPELL Study — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.