Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Efficacy of Myofascial Release Therapy on Pain, Mobility and Function in Patients with Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Syed Rais Akhter Rizvi, Shailendra Mehta

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 118–125 · Published 10 Sep 2025

10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i95932

Abstract

Background: Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder affecting quality of life and functional independence. Nonspecific neck pain, which manifests as simple neck discomfort without a clearly identifiable underlying cause and often arises from postural or mechanical stressors, is the most prevalent type observed in clinical practice. Myofascial release therapy (MFR) has emerged as a manual therapy technique aimed at reducing fascial restrictions and improving mobility. Objective: The present study evaluates the efficacy of MFR in reducing pain, improving cervical range of motion (CROM), and enhancing functional outcomes in individuals with NSNP. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at KTG Mult speciality Hospital on 30 participants aged 25–50 years with NSNP persisting for more than 3 months. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: MFR Group (n = 15) and Control Group receiving Sham MFR and Symptom specific exercises (n = 15). Both groups received the same interventions in terms of the symptom specific exercise and electrotherapy, the only difference being that the MFR group received Myofascial Release where-as the control group received sham Myofascial release. Interventions were delivered thrice weekly for 3 weeks. Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), functional disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI), and Cervical Range of Motion were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The MFR group showed significantly greater improvements in VAS (mean reduction 4.2 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), NDI (mean reduction 18.4 ± 5.2 vs. 8.9 ± 4.6, p < 0.001), and CROM (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation; all p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Conclusion: MFR was more effective than conventional stretching in reducing pain, enhancing CROM, and improving functional outcomes in NSNP. Incorporating MFR into physiotherapy protocols may provide additional clinical benefits.

Myofascial release nonspecific neck pain cervical range of motion neck disability index randomized controlled trial

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.