Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Effects of Two Planting Patterns and Plant Densities on the Productivity and Profitability of Cotton

Dan D. Fromme, Lawrence L. Falconer, Roy D. Parker, Robert G. Lemon, Carlos J. Fernandez, W. James Grichar

Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 130–141 · Published 28 Oct 2013

10.9734/AJEA/2014/5222

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effect of two planting patterns across two plant densities on cotton growth, yield, fiber quality, and net returns. Study Design: Randomized complete block design with a 2 x 2 factorial treatment arrangement with 3 replicates was used for a total of 12 plots.  Place and Duration of Study: Studies were conducted during the 2003 and 2004 growing seasons on a producer’s farm located south of Eagle Lake, Texas in Colorado County (29.49360 N, 96.34060 W). Methodology: Rows were spaced 91.4-cm apart on raised beds.  Plot size was eight rows by 972 m long.  The two different factors included two row planting patterns, the solid pattern with every single row planted and the skip-row pattern with a 2x1 planting pattern where 2 rows are planted and 1 row is left fallow.  For the skip-row pattern, rows three and six were not planted in the 8 row plot.  The second factor was seeding rate with two plant populations of 84000 and 126000 plants/ha. Results: In neither year were any differences seen with seeding rate.  In 2003, days to cut-out with the skip-row pattern were 92.4d while with the solid pattern days to cut-out were 87.9d and plant height with the skip-row pattern was 100 cm while with the solid pattern, plant height was 87 cm. Lint yield was 1504 kg/ha for the solid pattern while with the skip-row pattern lint yield was 1347 kg/ha. In 2004, lint yield with the solid pattern was 27% greater than the skip-row pattern. Slight differences between the two planting patterns were observed during 2004 in days to cut-out or plant height.  In both years, the solid planting pattern produced a net dollar value/ha increase over the skip-row pattern and therefore should be the row pattern used along the upper Texas Gulf Coast

Cotton skip-row solid planting plant growth net returns

Cited by 1

Cotton Yield and Quality Response to Row Pattern and Seeding Rate

R. Sorensen, M. Lamb, C. Butts · Journal of Cotton Science · 2022

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

1

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.