Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Effectiveness and Safety of Cimicifuga Racemosa and Blackberry Compared to Soy Isoflavone for the Treatment of Climacteric Symptoms: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Me. Magali de Fátima Pereira Madureira, Yasmin dos Santos Louzano, Tiago Marques dos Reis, Dra. Fernanda Borges de Araújo Paula

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 313–325 · Published 21 Dec 2024

10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i125679

Abstract

The female reproductive phase ends with climacteric syndrome, marked by hormonal variations (progesterone/estrogen). Cimicifuga racemosa (CR), Morus nigra (MN), and soy isoflavones (SI) have emerged as complementary treatments, potentially reducing symptoms. However, evidence gaps persist regarding the effectiveness and safety of CR and MN, necessitating a systematic review. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and safety of CR or MN with SI in managing climacteric syndrome. Study design: A review of systematic reviews was conducted, structured using the PICO acronym. Searches were performed in March 2024 across Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Lilacs, and grey literature. The study was registered in PROSPERO, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full-text reviews by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR-2. Results: Of 1,291 records, 27 studies underwent full-text review, but none were included. Variability in dosages, SI formulations, and the frequent use of placebo comparators precluded synthesis of safety and effectiveness for CR or MN versus SI. Conclusion: Despite substantial scientific interest in herbal treatments for climacteric syndrome, comparative evidence on CR, MN, and SI remains unavailable. This gap limits evidence-based decision-making for managing climacteric symptoms.

Cimicifuga racemosa climacteric complementary practices phytotherapy menopause morus nigra soy isoflavones

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

7

Page views

0

PDF downloads

3

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.