Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Economic Valuation of Rice Crop Damage by Red-billed Quelea and Other Granivorous Birds on a Rural Irrigation Scheme in Western Kenya

Nickson Erick Otieno, Alex S. Mutati, Cynthia Akoth, Dominick Chesire, Daniel O. Ogwang, Timothy Mwinami, Philip Opiyo Alaro

Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International · pp. 156–167 · Published 16 Dec 2014

10.9734/JAERI/2015/14178

Abstract

Aims: The study aimed at estimating economic losses incurred by farmers from damage of rice crop by graniviorous pest birds and assessing the implication of this for sustainable food security. Study Design: Line transect bird sampling with spatial and temporal replications; bird feeding rate determination; per-season and per annum economic valuation of rice damage Place and Duration of Study: Ahero Rice Irrigation Scheme in western Kenya from November 2011 to February 2012. Methodology: To estimate economic losses of rice we first estimated graniviorous bird density from two census periods from whence we estimated seasonal and annual quantities of rice loss calculated from the birds’ feeding rates. We then valued economic damage as a factor of the crop loss and prevailing rice producer market price and finally estimated net economic loss by subtracting the cost of hiring labour to scare birds from damaging mature crop. Period of bird damage was restricted to the period between crop-maturity to harvest. Results: Estimated annual loss was 407 tonnes or 7.7% of potential yield for the whole irrigation scheme excluding bird scaring costs. This was equivalent to Ksh. 40.7 million annually at 1 USD=87 Ksh. representing a 31.1% loss of net income. Inclusive of bird scaring costs, annual losses were Ksh. 20,763/ha equivalent to 39.5% of net income. Estimated annual rice damage due to Q. quelea was more than that due to the other granivorous birds combined (215 compared to 192 tonnes). Conclusion: This loss magnitude considerably undermines efforts to reduce rural poverty and attain sustainable food security. In addition to the crop-guarding method, reducing losses from damage by the pest birds requires integration of several measures that have proved successful elsewhere, adoption of improved farming technologies and planting recently developed higher- yielding rice varieties. 

Economic valuation rice damage pest birds quelea quelea ahero Kenya irrigation Kenya

References (34)

  1. 1 Managing Wetland Habitats for Waterbirds: An International Perspective [DOI]
  2. 2 Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural–forest mosaic [DOI]
  3. 3 The Value of Rice Fields as Substitutes for Natural Wetlands for Waterbirds in the Mediterranean Region [DOI]
  4. 4 The potential for interactions between predation and habitat change to cause population declines of farmland birds [DOI]
  5. 5 Important bird areas in Kenya [DOI]
  6. 6 Birds of Kenya and Northern Tanzania
  7. 7 NERICA : the new rice for Africa: a compendium [DOI]
  8. 8 Effects of Pesticide use in Rice Fields on Birds [DOI]
  9. 9 Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan [DOI]
  10. 10 Avian Foods, Foraging and Habitat Conservation in World Rice Fields [DOI]
  11. 11 Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice [DOI]
  12. 12 Estimating Bird Damage to Rice in Africa: Evidence from the Senegal River Valley [DOI]
  13. 13 Why Study Birds in Rice Fields? [DOI]
  14. 14 Implications of Rice Agriculture for Wild Birds in China [DOI]
  15. 15 Can management practices in rice fields contribute to amphibian conservation in southern Brazilian wetlands? [DOI]
  16. 16 Effects of bird predation on some pest insect populations in corn [DOI]
  17. 17 Rice Fields: an Ecosystem Rich in Biodiversity [DOI]
  18. 18 Efficacy of Aquatain, a Monomolecular Film, for the Control of Malaria Vectors in Rice Paddies [DOI]
  19. 19 Plant Diversity in Paddy Fields in Relation to Agricultural Practices in Savannakhet Province, Laos [DOI]
  20. 20 Fear in Farmlands: How Much Does Predator Avoidance Affect Bird Community Structure? [DOI]
  21. 21 Pests and Poverty: The Continuing Need for Crop Protection Research [DOI]
  22. 22 Use of Rice Fields by Birds in West Africa [DOI]
  23. 23 Bird damage to rice in Africa: evidence and control. [DOI]
  24. 24 Selection of flooded agricultural fields and other landscapes by female northern pintails wintering in Tulare Basin, California
  25. 25 NERICA Cultivation and its Yield Determinants: The Case of Upland Rice Farmers in Namulonge, Central Uganda [DOI]
  26. 26 Impact of NERICA Adoption on Incomes of Rice-Producing Households in Northern Ghana [DOI]
  27. 27 The mechanization of small-scale rice farming: Labor requirements and costs [DOI]
  28. 28 The impact of raptors on the abundance of upland passerines and waders [DOI]
  29. 29 Biodiversity and Complexity of Rice Farm Ecosystems: An Empirical Assessment [DOI]
  30. 30 Effects of carbofuran and metsulfuron-methyl on the benthic macroinvertebrate community in flooded ricefields [DOI]
  31. 31 Mist nets as a means of eliminating bird damage to vineyards [DOI]
  32. 32 Efficacy of nets and fibres for protecting crops from grain-eating birds in Africa [DOI]
  33. 33 Control Netting as a Hazard to Birds [DOI]
  34. 34 Managing populations of the Australasian harrier (Circus approximans) to reduce passerine bird damage in vineyards

Cited by 9

Socioeconomic development and ecological traits as predictors of human–bird conflicts

Paola Araneda, Omar Ohrens, José Tomás Ibarra · Conservation Biology · 2021

Showing 2 of 9 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

69

Page views

0

PDF downloads

18

Outbound clicks

9

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.