Interactive Effect of Soil Mulching and ISAREG Model Based Irrigation on Watermelon Production
Kleiton Rocha Saraiva, Thales Vinícius de Araújo Viana, Solerne Caminha Costa, Francisco Marcus Lima Bezerra, Clayton Moura de Carvalho, Raimundo Rodrigues Gomes Filho
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 1–13 · Published 7 Jul 2018
10.9734/JEAI/2018/42422Abstract
Even with the growing scenario of water scarcity, in the Northeastern semi-arid region, the irrigation management is still not properly managed, resulting in the waste of scarce water resources in the region. The ISAREG model has been used in several countries, being able to assist in the simulation of irrigation. In addition, the ISAREG model quantifies irrigation depths at different percentages of storage, increasing irrigation efficiency. Another way to reduce water loss in agriculture is through the use of soil cover, which is a simple technology and whose benefits over crop production and productivity are irrefutable. Added to this is the fact that interactions among these applications can amplify the effects. The objective of this study was to compare the irrigation propositions generated from ISAREG model with the actual irrigation management adopted by the farmers of the Jaguaribe - Apodi Irrigation District, Brazil. In addition, field experiments were performed to assess the influence of different irrigation and soil cover conditions on fruit development and yield of watermelon These field experiments were performed after field surveys with farmers in a randomized complete block design with subdivided plots and four replicates. The treatments consisted of the combination of four irrigation propositions (three ISAREG propositions: M1 = 100%, M2 = 80% and M3 = 60% of Available Water Capacity in Soil, and M4, irrigation depth used by irrigators), and four subplots, the uncovered soil (C0), covers with rice husks (C1), with white mulching (C2) and with black mulching (C3). The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and when significant, regression analysis, averages test and trend graphs were performed. The irrigation depths of 365.2 mm and 410 mm with a black mulching resulted in the highest numbers of fruits per plant (1.6). From the results, it was concluded that the farmers do not practice the correct management of the irrigation, because the farmers irrigated more water to a greater irrigation depth as indicated by the ISAREG model (100% of the Available Water Capacity in Soil) throughout the watermelon cultivation. In general, plants irrigated with 100% of available Water Capacity and on soils covered by rice husk and white mulching showed better productivity.
Cited by 2
Kleiton Rocha Saraiva, Francisco Marcus Lima Bezerra, Francisco de Souza · International Journal for Innovation Education and Research · 2021
Birara Gebeyhu, Genet Markos · Heliyon · 2023
Related research
- Morphometric Features of Cells of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Using Computer Aided Image Analysis — shares topic coverage
- Development of Software Application for Nigerian Traffic Flow Monitoring and Prediction of High-Way Infrastructural Facilities — shares topic coverage
- Technological Tools for Observational Evaluation - the Experience with the Software for Functional Evaluation Scale for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy – A Pilot Study Software for Observational Evaluation — shares topic coverage
- Ethical Considerations in an Educational Research: A Critical Analysis — shares topic coverage
- Software Development for the Prediction of Hydrate Formation Conditions — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.