Design of (3,2) and (4,2) CNTFET Ternary Counters for Multipliers
Daniel Etiemble, Ramzi A. Jaber
Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 103–118 · Published 15 Jul 2023
10.9734/ajrcos/2023/v16i3349Abstract
The reduction trees of combinational multipliers are widely applying counters. To be able to compare the ternary and the binary approaches, Nanotube Field-Effect Transistor (CNTFET) ternary (3,2) and ternary (4,2) counters have been designed. The ternary (4,2) counter is compared with the binary (7,3) counter as both compute approximately the same amount of information. The binary counter is more efficient. However, comparing counters is not enough: in the Wallace reduction tree of the ternary multiplier, there are two times more lines to reduce compared to the binary one, as a 1-trit multiplier generates both product and carry terms. Comparing the Wallace tree of an 8*8-trit multiplier and a 12*12-bit binary one also shows that the binary implementation is the most efficient.
Cited by 5
Ramzi A. Jaber, El Moucary Chady, Abdallah Kassem · 2025 32nd IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) · 2025
Ramzi A. Jaber, Hiba S. Bazzi, Abdallah Kassem · 2024 International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM) · 2024
Ramzi A. Jaber · 2025 37th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM) · 2025
Ramzi A. Jaber, El Moucary Chady, Abdallah Kassem · 2025 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications (ACTEA) · 2025
Showing 4 of 5 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
6
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
5
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.