Optimizing Stem Curriculum Design through Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Personalized Learning Algorithms in Secondary Education
Serrano, Arman Z., Mandapat, Jose Emmanuel C., Cuzzamu, Emerson B., Vinoya, Armando S.
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports · pp. 507–527 · Published 30 Jun 2025
10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i61075Abstract
The research compares AI-driven personalized learning algorithms and traditional learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics curriculum design optimization, with emphasis on secondary-level biology class in West Wendover High School, Nevada, United States. Using a two-shot quasi-experimental design, the research investigates the academic performance of Grade 10 students, a sample size of (n=60) who are divided into an experimental group (AI-driven learning) and a control group (traditional learning). Pre and post-tests assessed student performance in two biology units studied—Energy in the Ecosystem and Heredity and Variation— while surveys tracked the influence of student engagement, prior knowledge, and learning preferences on AI-driven learning effectiveness. Paired and independent sample t-tests were used to compare the two groups. Results show that the AI group participants' post-tests were considerably higher, with high levels of mastery (83.0% for Unit 3 and 90.9% for Unit 4), in contrast with the moderate mastery of the traditional group (69.2% for Unit 3 and 70.9% for Unit 4). Paired and independent samples t-tests statistical analysis proved to the superiority of AI-driven learning compared to traditional learning in terms of improving academic performance, particularly in complex subjects like genetics, heredity, and variation. Besides, AI-driven learning improved learners' engagement by facilitating real-time feedback, adaptive learning paths, and interactive digital tools, while the study highlights the importance of consolidating foundational knowledge alongside AI integration. The paper concludes that AI-driven personalized learning considerably improves STEM learning because it meets personal learning requirements, stimulates interest, and makes complex ideas simpler. For optimum AI-driven teaching, though, STEM curricula should integrate personalized AI-driven with interactive, peer-to-peer learning exercises to promote greater conceptual comprehension. Based on these findings, this study recommends the use of AI-driven tools in STEM courses, the development of advanced adaptive learning features, and the implementation of hybrid approaches to AI-driven and traditional learning. It also recommends district leaders, curriculum designers, and instructors to explore AI-driven personalized learning to enhance curriculum optimization and continue researching to design and test these methods for large-scale implementation.
Cited by 1
1 citation reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- The Impact/Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesia: Remote Pre-Operative Assessment and Perioperative — shares topic coverage
- Detecting Dental Caries through Captured Images Using the Machine Learning Technology Teachable Machine — shares topic coverage
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Analytics: From Diagnosis to Treatment Optimization — shares topic coverage
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review — shares topic coverage
- Artificial Intelligence in the Analysis of the Fetal Genome in Utero: A Critical Review of Current Paradigms, Clinical Utility and Future Horizons — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.