Cultivating Analytical Competence through Learning by Research (LBR): A Quasi-Experimental Study in Junior Secondary School
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · pp. 354–364 · Published 26 Sep 2026
10.9734/ajess/2026/v52i103375Abstract
Analytical competence, the capacity to interpret information, examine relationships among variables, evaluate the credibility of evidence, and draw evidence-based inferences, is widely regarded as one of the cognitive foundations of scientific literacy; yet Indonesian secondary students continue to underperform on international measures of this capacity. This study examined whether the Learning by Research (LBR) model, a research-based pedagogy that embeds the stages of scientific inquiry into classroom instruction, developed junior secondary students' analytical competence more effectively than conventional direct instruction. A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group design was used with two intact Year 8 classes at a state junior high school in Jakarta (n = 40 per group) engaged in an integrated science-social studies co-curricular programme on the theme of chronic kidney disease risk. Analytical competence was assessed with a five-dimension rubric covering interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation, adapted from Facione's (1990) Delphi taxonomy and administered as a pretest and posttest. Data were analysed using normalised gain (N-gain) scores, and parametric assumptions were confirmed via the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests before an independent-samples t-test. The experimental group achieved a mean N-gain of 0.61 (moderate category), compared with 0.29 (low category) in the control group. The difference was statistically significant, t(78) = 18.35, p < 0.001, supporting the alternative hypothesis and indicating that Learning by Research (LBR) influenced students' analytical skills. Gains were most pronounced in the analysis and inference dimensions, suggesting that the iterative cycle of data collection and interpretation embedded in LBR selectively strengthened the operational core of analytical competence rather than uniformly improving all its facets. The findings position LBR as a viable, classroom-feasible alternative to direct instruction for cultivating analytical competence within co-curricular, deep-learning-oriented programmes.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Using Collaborative Reporting to Improve the Speaking Skills of Grade 11 Students — shares topic coverage
- The Effect of Digital Stories on the Value Perceptions of Middle School Students — shares topic coverage
- Effectiveness of Collaborative AutoCAD File Editing on Students' Learning of Structural Layout and Details — shares topic coverage
- Human–AI Collaborative Oral Practice in University EFL: A Quasi-Experimental Study — shares topic coverage
- Exploring the Effects of Home-based Learning on Basic Science Students' Academic Achievement, Retention and Interest in Delta Central Senatorial District, Delta State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
42
Page views
0
PDF downloads
5
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.