Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comprehensive Assessment of Aphid (Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) Resistance in Mustard Cultivars

Sandhya Sinha, Abhishek Shukla, Yashowardhan Singh

Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology · pp. 39–45 · Published 1 Feb 2024

10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i1678

Abstract

The study focuses on mustard (Brassica spp.) crops, crucial rabi oilseed crops in India. This study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 45 mustard crop cultivars to Lipaphis erysimi Kaltenbach, commonly known as the mustard aphid, a significant biotic stressor affecting Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). The necessity of this study lies in the importance of identifying aphid-resistant cultivars to enhance pest management strategies and improve mustard crop yields. Field experiments were conducted at Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India during the rabi season, using a Randomized Block Design. The study utilized a mean aphid index-based scoring scheme to categorize the cultivars into different susceptibility levels, ranging from highly resistant to highly susceptible. The classification was determined based on normal distribution values, including highly resistant (HR), resistant (R), moderately resistant (MR), moderately susceptible (MS), susceptible (S), and highly susceptible (HS). The results revealed that none of the cultivars fell into the highly resistant category, but five cultivars demonstrated resistance, with mean aphid index values below 0.34. Thirty cultivars were classified as moderately resistant, displaying mean aphid index values between 0.34 and 0.66. Six cultivars exhibited moderate susceptibility (mean aphid index between 0.66 and 0.82), while four cultivars were categorized as susceptible (mean aphid index between 0.82 and 0.98). Notably, none of the cultivars were highly susceptible. The study underscores the importance of identifying aphid-resistant cultivars to enhance pest management strategies and improve mustard crop yields. The results provide valuable insights into the susceptibility levels of different cultivars, guiding farmers in selecting appropriate varieties for cultivation. The research also emphasizes the significance of environmentally friendly pest management options, considering the potential risks associated with pesticide use. Overall, this study contributes to the development of sustainable Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques for Indian mustard cultivation.

Cultivars lipaphis erysimi mustard mean aphid index value screening

References (6)

  1. 1 Assessment of Aphid Infestation in Mustard by Hyperspectral Remote Sensing [DOI]
  2. 2 Prioritizing components of package of integrated pest management in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in India for better economic benefit [DOI]
  3. 3 Mustard aphid infestation in India: development of forewarning models.
  4. 4 Incidence and management of mustard aphid (Lipaphis ery-simi Kaltenbach) in West Bengal.
  5. 5 Screening of Brassica germplasm for resistance to mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) [DOI]
  6. 6 Screening of different varieties/genotypes for their susceptibility against mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach).

Cited by 2

Decoding aphid outbreaks: impact of sowing windows and mustard varietal diversity on the population fluctuations of mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi)

Insha Muzaffar, S. Sarkar, Arshdeep Singh · International Journal of Tropical Insect Science · 2026

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

13

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.