Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine with Clonidine Versus Intrathecal Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Post-operative Pain Treatment in Lower Limb Procedures
Priyanka Deshmukh, Pratibha Deshmukh, Sohal Parate, Sweety Agrawal, Vivek Chakole
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · pp. 3848–3855 · Published 28 Dec 2021
10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i60B35086Abstract
Background: One of the anaesthesiologist's key goals during spinal anaesthesia is to keep the body physiology as close to normal as feasible. As we all know, subarachnoid block causes significant hemodynamic changes, especially in trauma and elderly individuals. Sympathetic nervous system denervation, skeletal muscle weakness, or loss of proprioception are not linked to neuraxial opioids. They primarily operate on the receptors found in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal cord to exert their synergistic analgesic impact on visceral pain. Opioids and local anaesthetics delivered intrathecally have a powerful synergistic analgesic effect. A 2 adrenergic agonist, Clonidine is sometimes used as a local anaesthetic adjuvant with mixed effects. The effects of intrathecal Clonidine vs Fentanyl with 0.5 percent hyperbaric bupivacaine on postoperative analgesic duration and adverse effects were compared. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 0.5 percent hyperbaric bupivacaine with Clonidine (75 gs) vs Fentanyl (25 gs) for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb procedures, as well as the postoperative pain alleviation and adverse effects in both groups. Methods: This was a prospective study involving 80 patients who were scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under spinal anaesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group C (15mg 0.5 percent bupivacaine + 75gs Clonidine) or Group F (15mg 0.5 percent bupivacaine + 25gs Fentanyl). Results: We discovered a time delay in the start of sensory and motor block in group C after assessing the outcomes of our investigation. Group C's sensory and motor block lasted significantly longer compared to group F. The average duration of analgesia in groups C and F was 234.7529.71 minutes and 170.8732.38 minutes, respectively. Compared to group C, the demand for rescue analgesics was higher in group F throughout 24 hours. Bradycardia affected 12 individuals in group C, while pruritus affected 12 patients in group F. Five of the patients in group F experienced nausea. Conclusion: In compared to 25gs Fentanyl, adjuvant use of Clonidine 75gs with hyperbaric bupivacaine prolongs the duration of both sensory and motor blockage, as well as the length of analgesia postoperatively, without generating substantial hemodynamic compromise or other side effects.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Comparison of Ketamine, Clonidine, and Fentanyl as Anesthetics in the Pediatric Population: A Review of Literature — shares topic coverage
- The Action of Adrenergic Agonists and Antagonists in the Present of Bupropion in the Vta Nucleus on Morphine Withdrawal Syndrome on Episodic Behaviors in Rats — shares topic coverage
- Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of Midazolam and Clonidine as Premedication Agents: Assessing Heart Rate Response and Anti-Sialogogue Effect in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia — shares topic coverage
- Controlling Post-operative Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Tibia Fracture Surgery: Pregabalin vs. Clonidine — shares topic coverage
- Modulatory Effect of Pausinystalia yohimbe on Nitric Oxide/PDE-5 Pathway and Hormonal Profile in Clonidine-Induced Erectile Dysfunction among Wistar Rats — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
7
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.