Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparing the Performance of Four Sinc Methods for Numerical Indefinite Integration

Richard Olatokunbo Akinola

Asian Research Journal of Mathematics · pp. 7–41 · Published 14 Dec 2021

10.9734/arjom/2021/v17i1130339

Abstract

Aims/ Objectives: To compare the performance of four Sinc methods for the numerical approximation of indefinite integrals with algebraic or logarithmic end-point singularities. Methodology: The first two quadrature formulas were proposed by Haber based on the sinc method, the third is Stengers Single Exponential (SE) formula and Tanaka et al.s Double Exponential (DE) sinc method completes the number. Furthermore, an application of the four quadrature formulas on numerical examples, reveals convergence to the exact solution by Tanaka et al.s DE sinc method than by the other three formulae. In addition, we compared the CPU time of the four quadrature methods which was not done in an earlier work by the same author. Conclusion: Haber formula A is the fastest as revealed by the CPU time.

Singularities sinc indefinite integrals quadrature

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

6

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.