Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Pronto Dry Rapid Urease® and Culture to Histopathology among Endoscopy Patients at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi-Kenya

Stephen Njoroge, Catherine Mwangi, Kimang’a Nyerere, Gunturu Revathi, Smita Devani, Allan Rajula, Rose Kamenwa, Nyamongo Onkoba, Fredrick Odhiambo

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 1–7 · Published 17 Jun 2019

10.9734/jammr/2019/v29i1230147

Abstract

Aim: This study sought to evaluate Pronto dry rapid urease® diagnostic test and compare its performance with culture. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration: From September 2017 to July 2018, across-sectional study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital. Methodology: Patients attending endoscopy unit at the hospital were randomly sampled to provide gastric biopsy specimen. One specimen was tested for presence or absence of H. pylori using Pronto dry rapid urease® test and another specimen subjected to in vitro culture test which were then compared with histology reference results. Test validity and reliability was determined using Graph Pad Prism v5.01. Results: Of 274 study specimens, 121(44%) were positive for histology. Ninety-one (33%) of the study specimen were positive for culture compared to 147(54%) for Pronto dry rapid urease®. Pronto dry rapid urease® test had sensitivity of 100% (97.5%-100%) against 73.6% (64.8%-81.3%) for culture. Specificity was 96.1% (91.1%-98.7%) for Pronto dry rapid urease® compared to 35.3% (95% CI 24.1%-47.8%) for culture. Positive predictive value was 96.7% (92.5-98.9%) for Pronto dry rapid urease® compared to 97.8% (92.3%-99.7%) for culture. Negative predictive value was 100% (97%-100%) for Pronto dry rapid urease® against 82.5% (76.2%-87.7%) for culture. There was significant difference between both Pronto dry rapid urease® and culture test performance with histology in all validity measures, P< 0.001. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between Pronto dry rapid urease® and culture in all validity measures due to overlapping confidence intervals. Conclusion: Pronto dry rapid urease® out-performed culture in sensitivity and NPV. It would be the method of choice in H. pylori detection where histology is untenable and antimicrobial profiling which require culturing the bacterium is needless.

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis pronto dry rapid® urease test biopsy rapid urease diagnostic tests

Cited by 6

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders using different methods in Khuzestan, Southwest Iran

Niloofar Karimi Afshar, Effat Abbasi Montazeri, Mohammad Savari · Molecular Biology Reports · 2025

Semi-quantitative assessment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> by rapid urease tests in pediatrics

E. A. Kornienko, E. O. Kolomina, N. I. Parolova · Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology · 2024

Fluorescent Probe for the pH-Independent Rapid and Sensitive Direct Detection of Urease-Producing Bacteria

Werner C. Albrich, Christian R. Kahlert, Susanne Nigg · Analytical Chemistry · 2024

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.