Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Study of Stromeyer, Basquin and Wöhler Fatigue Models Using Shot-peened and Electroless Nickel Plating Metal

Rimyalegdo Kiébré, Souleymane Ramdé, Vasilieos Kourakos

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 42–49 · Published 11 Aug 2026

10.9734/cjast/2026/v45i94746

Abstract

This study compares the Stromeyer, Basquin, and Wöhler fatigue models for E235 steel under three surface conditions: untreated, shot-peened, and shot-peened followed by electroless nickel coating. Fatigue specimens were extracted from a pump-rotor section selected to represent a region susceptible to service-related cracking. Tests were conducted in air at room temperature under force control, with a mechanical stress ratio of 0.1, a frequency of approximately 60 Hz, and a stopping criterion of 2 × 10^6 cycles or a 2 Hz reduction in test frequency. The experimental results were analysed using the ESOPE software to estimate model parameters, fatigue limits, standard deviations, and rejection rates. For the untreated condition, the Stromeyer model produced a converted fatigue-limit estimate of 344.6 MPa and a rejection rate of 75.82%. Shot peening increased the corresponding estimate to 419.8 MPa and reduced the rejection rate to 31.57%. Following electroless nickel coating, the estimated value decreased to 299.6 MPa, while the rejection rate increased to 86.69%. Among the examined conditions, the shot-peened specimens therefore showed the highest estimated fatigue resistance and the lowest rejection rate. The results indicate that model performance varies substantially with surface condition and experimental scatter. Under the tested conditions, the Stromeyer model provided the most consistent representation of the shot-peened dataset, whereas the untreated and nickel-coated datasets showed greater variability and lower fitting reliability.

Prediction of fatigue Stromeyer model Wöhler model Basquin model shot-peened metal electroless nickel coating

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

32

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.