Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Class V Cavity Restored with Alkasite Glass Ionomer Cement, Nano Filled Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement & Nano-hybrid Composite Using Finite Element Analysis
International Journal of Research and Reports in Dentistry · pp. 48–55 · Published 3 Jan 2020
Abstract
Background: Causes of failures in class V restorations have always been controversial until now since the biomechanical aspects of these restorations have been understood. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the stress distribution of a class V restoration in a lower first premolar using a two-dimensional plane strain finite element model. Materials and Methods: The study was done by modelling a mandibular first premolar which was sectioned buccolingually, in the Ansys 14.5 finite element software. A 100N eccentric load was applied on the tooth structure and stresses were observed at the peripheries of the class V restoration when it was restored with Centurion N, Giomer and Ketac N100 respectively. Finite element analysis has been used to evaluate the stress distribution. Results: Alkasite glass ionomer cement & Nanohybrid composite values were comparable to withstand masticatory forces but depicted significantly higher resistance to masticatory load when compared to nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: Alkasite glass ionomer cement & Nanohybrid composite are suitable restorative material for class V restorations because of low-stress transfer to the tooth.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.