Comparative Evaluation of 0.5% Levobupivacaine V/S 0.5% Levobupivacaine Mixed with 20µG Dexmedetomidine in Mandibular Iii Molar Surgeries – A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · pp. 56–63 · Published 16 Feb 2022
10.9734/jpri/2022/v34i11A35534Abstract
Background: Mandibular third molars (M3M) are the most common impacted teeth in the human dentition. Removal or extraction of these teeth is frightening for the patients owing to the perception of pain. As a result, pain control mechanism like anesthesia is the major factor that needs to be executed appropriately. Using newer local anesthetic drugs minimizes side effects and drug interactions. Levobupivacaine (Levo) is a congener of bupivacaine thereby minimizing the cardiotoxic effects of bupivacaine. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is an alpha agonist which alongwith Levo is capable of providing prolonged duration of anesthesia decreasing the need for rescue analgesics. Aim: This study will compare the anesthetic effectiveness between Levo and Levo alongwith Dex during the extraction of impacted M3M. Methodology: A total of 50 consecutive systemically healthy patients requiring unilateral surgical extraction of impacted M3M with similar orientations will be divided into two groups randomly, one group (L) will receive nerve block with levo while the second group (LD) will receive Levo plus Dex during the extraction procedure. Results: ‘Students t-test’ will be used to analyse and evaluate. The patients will be evaluated based on different parameters. The patient will be asked to reciprocate about the first bout of pain experience based on the Visual Analog Scale that will be handed over to patient after the procedure. The other parameters that will be evaluated are Onset on Anesthesia, Depth of Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Oxygen saturation level, Sedation level and duration of post-operative analgesia. The patient will be evaluated over the time duration after which the patient had to take a rescue analgesic. Conclusion: Levo with Dex is more efficient than Levo in providing prolonged duration of anesthesia and has prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- The Impact/Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesia: Remote Pre-Operative Assessment and Perioperative — shares topic coverage
- Maternal Obesity and Obstetric Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Clinical Strategies — shares topic coverage
- Management of Local Anesthesia Failures in Endodontics with Different Anesthetic Techniques and Agents — shares topic coverage
- Anaesthetic Approach in a Case with Hypothyroidis — shares topic coverage
- Manuel High-Frequency-Ventilation during Sleeve Pneumonectomy — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
22
Page views
0
PDF downloads
1
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.