Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Non-linear Growing Degree Day Methods for Wheat Yield Prediction in Punjab, India

Satinder Kaur, KK Gill, Baljeet Kaur, Navneet Kaur, Sandeep Singh Sandhu, Kavita Bhatt

Asian Research Journal of Agriculture · pp. 185–194 · Published 10 Jun 2025

10.9734/arja/2025/v18i2693

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of three Growing Degree Day (GDD) calculation methods—linear (Method 1), improved linear (Method 2), and cosine-wave (Method 3)—for predicting wheat phenological stages and yield in Punjab, India, to optimize agricultural practices in semi-arid regions. Study Design: Comparative field-based experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Research Farms of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana; Research Station, Faridkot, and Research Station, ballowal Saunkhri. Methodology: Field experiments involved the wheat variety Unnat PBW 550, planted on November 15th at three locations. Weather data from Agrometeorological Observatories were used to calculate GDD using three methods. Phenological stages were observed, and GDD was computed for each method. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), Willmott’s refined index of agreement (dr), and logistic modeling of dry matter accumulation (R² and RMSE). Results: GDD for maturity at Ballowal Saunkhri was 1880.8 ± 34 °C (Method 1), 1710.65 ± 34 °C (Method 2), and 1618 ± 38 °C (Method 3). Method 3 showed the lowest CV (3.5% for tillering) and highest dr (0.98 in 2020 at Ballowal Saunkhri). Logistic modeling indicated Method 3’s superior accuracy (R² = 0.989, RMSE = 0.039 at Ballowal Saunkhri) compared to Method 1 (R² = 0.982, RMSE = 0.047) and Method 2 (R² = 0.970, RMSE = 0.062). Conclusion: The cosine-wave method (Method 3) offers superior precision for GDD estimation, enhancing wheat yield predictions and resource management in semi-arid regions. Further validation across diverse crops and climates is recommended.

GDD cosine-wave phenological modeling wheat index of agreement

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

11

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.