Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Cobham's Thesis as the Sorites Paradox

Alexander Bolotin

Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science · pp. 1–6 · Published 19 Jan 2019

10.9734/JAMCS/2019/46241

Abstract

According to Cobham’s thesis, computational problems can be practically (or, in other words, feasibly) computed on some computational device only if they can be computed in polynomial time. Despite the presence of many objections to this claim, they are all not decisive. Then again, there is one not explored yet critical objection to the claim. Namely, Cobham's thesis is susceptible to paradoxical reasoning emerging as a result of the indeterminacy surrounding limits of application of the vague predicate “is practical” (“is feasible”). What is more, as it is demonstrated in the present paper, any attempt to defuse such reasoning and make Cobham's thesis non paradoxical causes it to become of no purpose at all.

Complexity theory Cobham’s thesis sorties paradox truth-value assignment supervaluationism many-valued logic

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

9

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.