Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Analyzing Different Architectures of Convolutional Neural Networks for Tomato Grading System

S M Abdullah Al Shuaeb, Anwar Hossen, Md Ashikul Haque Dinar, Utpal Kanti Roy

Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 137–147 · Published 14 Dec 2024

10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i12534

Abstract

The tomato is a very popular and commonly eaten fruit. Its quality, which affects how people see it, depends a lot on how it looks. Convolutional neural networks, which are advanced computer programs, are great at using deep learning to sort and classify fruits, grains, and vegetables in farming. Right now, there are two ways to classify tomatoes: by eye or by analyzing images. The first method, which involves checking tomatoes by hand, is more accurate but takes longer and costs more. The second method, which uses images, is faster and cheaper but not as precise. In this study, we use a deep learning approach to classify tomato quality, specifically using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We compared two popular CNN models, ResNet-50 and AlexNet, and tested how well these models automatically find important features in the tomatoes. The success percentage of our suggested strategy in experiments was 99.1%. Our proposed method outperforms existing image-processed tomato quality rating systems on all five of the commonly used evaluation criteria, including accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F-score.

Machine Learning (ML) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Confusion Matrix (CM) Deep Learning (DL) ResNet-50 AlexNet

References (3)

  1. 1 Computer Vision Based Fruit Grading System for Quality Evaluation of Tomato in Agriculture industry [DOI]
  2. 2 Tomato Maturity Evaluation Using Color Image Analysis [DOI]
  3. 3 Innovations in Bio-inspired Computing and Applications [DOI]

Cited by 2

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

6

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.