Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

An Appraisal of Screening Methods for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

M. Najimudeen, K. Sachchithanantham

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 2853–2865 · Published 6 Mar 2014

10.9734/BJMMR/2014/6166

Abstract

The importance of screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is universally accepted but there is controversy and uncertainty about the most suitable method of screening among various populations. The majority of the patients are asymptomatic. After nearly 60 years of research the screening and diagnosis of GDM, universal screening evades uniform acceptance and remains debatable. Multiple studies, numerous global consensus conferences and several multicenter trials had not identified the unique procedure. Surprisingly still there is uncertainty regarding the most effective method of screening among various populations. The prevalence of GDM varies from less than 1% to more than 10% It is increasing due to dietary habits, overweight, maternal age, ethnicity, family history and past history .Prevalence vary due to the use of a wide range of definitions and diagnostic test criteria, as well as variations across regions and ethnic groups. The merits of available screening methods such as urine testing for glycosuria, 50g glucose challenge test (GCT), random blood sugar testing, fasting blood glucose (FBS) , estimation of glycosylated haemoglobin , fructosamine ,75g oral Glucose Tolerance Test (75g OGTT) and two step approach (Combination of methods) are analysed. In countries where funds are limited, certainly the selective screening is cost effective compared to whole population screening. After many decades of research, only up-to-date considerations are Random blood glucose, O’Sullivan, 75g and Complete OGTT.

Gestational diabetes mellitus screening methods universal screening selective screening combination methods.

Cited by 3

Showing 1 of 3 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

15

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

3

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.