AMMI Biplot Analysis in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Genotypes for Genotype X Environment Interaction at Four Agro-ecologies in Telangana State
N. Lingaiah, A. Sudharshanam, V. Thirumala Rao, Y. Prashant, M. Vijay Kumar, P. Indhudar Reddy, B. Ram Prasad, P. Raghu Rami Reddy, P. Jagan Mohan Rao
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 98–103 · Published 19 Jun 2020
10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i1530722Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the genotype × environment interaction (GEI) and stability performance of eight promising cotton genotypes at four agro-ecologies in Telangana State. The experimental material consisting of eight genotypes were planted in randomized block design replicating thrice in four diverse environments of Telangana state during 2017, Kharif season. The present investigation was carried out in four diverse environments of Telangana state viz. RARS, Warangal, ARS, Adilabad, ARS, Modhole and RARS, Palem (Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University) during 2017, Kharif season. The study was conducted at four diversified agro-ecologies of Telangana State. The experimental material comprised of eight genotypes viz., WGCV-109, ADB-638, WGCV-122, Narasimha, WGCV-119, WGCV-119, Srirama, WGCV-48 and ADB 645. First pooled analysis of variance was carried out to know the significance variation in genotype x environment interaction followed by AMMI analysis for genotype x environment interaction studies. Analysis of variance was significant for environments and (G x E) components indicating the use fullness of AMMI analysis in identifying the stable genotypes. Among the eight cotton genotypes, WGCV-109, Narasimha and ADB-645 were found to be best yielders over environments whereas the genotypes G7 (WGCV-48) and G4 (Narasimha) found to be stable. Most of the genotypes showed environment specificity. As a result, almost all of the evaluated genotypes were affected by the genotype x environment interaction effects, hence no genotype had superior performance in all environments.
Cited by 7
Juwu Gong, Depei Kong, Changwen Liu · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2022
Sivakumar Subbarayan, Bharathi Kumar K, Anantharaju P · 2024
SUBBARAYAN SIVAKUMAR, SADASIVAM MANICKAM, BANOTH MADHU · Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry · 2024
Waleed Mohamed Bassuny Yehia, Ezz El-Din Ibrahim Zaazaa, Essam Fathy El-Hashash · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science · 2023
W. M. B. Yehia, Essam F. El-Hashash, Karima Mohamed El-Absy · Scientific Reports · 2026
Bana Venkata Ravi Prakash Reddy, K. Mohan Vishnuvardhan, K. Amarnath · Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization · 2024
Showing 6 of 7 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Biopotential of Some Trichoderma spp. against Growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Vasinfectum Causal Agent of Cotton Wilt — shares topic coverage
- Epidemiology of Cotton Verticillium wilt in Golestan Province, the North of Iran — shares topic coverage
- Influence of Heat Units on Defoliation, Physiology and Yield of Cotton during Defoliants Application — shares topic coverage
- Growth Performance and Decomposition Analysis of Major Cotton Growing States of India — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Comparable Crops to Maize in Rain Fed Alfisols of Telangana State — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
7
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.