Agro-Climatic Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Control Practices of Hard Tick Infestation in Cattle in Gujarat, India
D. B. Bhinsara, J. B. Solanki, Niranjan Kumar, I. H. Kalyani, D. C. Patel
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 28–37 · Published 18 Sep 2026
10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i104523Abstract
Background: Hard tick infestation in cattle was investigated across seven agro-climatic zones of Gujarat, India, to determine prevalence, genus-level distribution, seasonal patterns, host- and management-associated factors, and farmer-reported control practices. Aims: To determine the prevalence, agro-climatic distribution, tick-genera pattern, host- and management-associated factors, seasonal variation, and farmer-reported tick-control practices in cattle across seven agro-climatic zones of Gujarat, India. Study Design: Cross-sectional field epidemiological survey with morphological identification of collected hard ticks and a structured owner questionnaire. Place and Duration of Study: Cattle herds located in seven agro-climatic zones of Gujarat were surveyed. Morphological identification was undertaken at the Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Navsari. The research period was July 2023 to July 2026 Methodology: Hard ticks were collected using forceps, maintained in labelled ventilated vials, and identified morphologically using standard taxonomic keys. Information on age, sex, housing, floor type, feeding pattern, season, body condition, conjunctival colour, ectoparasites and tick-control practices was recorded. Prevalence was expressed as percentages. Chi-square tests were calculated from the aggregate animal counts for age, housing, floor, feeding, season, body condition and conjunctival colour. Results: Overall tick prevalence was 59.19% (1,311/2,215). Prevalence was highest in Middle Gujarat (65.65%), Southern Gujarat (64.72%) and North Saurashtra (64.44%), and was lowest in Southern Hills (47.00%). Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus was the predominant category (27.36%), followed by Hyalomma spp. (17.83%), Haemaphysalis spp. (9.89%) and mixed infestation (4.11%). Infestation declined with age (73.33% in <1 year, 61.66% in 1–3 years and 48.74% in >3 years; P < .001). Higher prevalence occurred in Kachha housing (71.76%), earthen floors (84.40%), group feeding (69.46%), poor body condition (80.50%) and pale conjunctiva (84.79%); each association was significant (P < .001). Summer prevalence (70.00%) exceeded monsoon (63.02%) and winter (43.71%) prevalence (P < .001). Conclusion: Hard tick infestation is widespread in cattle in Gujarat and varies substantially with agro-climatic setting, host condition and animal husbandry. The findings support zone-specific surveillance, improved housing and hygiene, targeted farmer guidance, and integrated tick management coupled with acaricide-resistance monitoring.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Assessment of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice among Palestinian Mothers in the Gaza Strip: A Mixed Methods Design — shares topic coverage
- Impact of the Diet Profile and Alcohol Consumption on Cardiometabolic Risks in Dschang Health District-Cameroon — shares topic coverage
- The Prevalence, Risk Factors and Awareness of Hypertension in an Urban Population of Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India — shares topic coverage
- ABO Blood Groups and Malaria Prevalence in a Referral Hospital in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Prevalence of Malaria among Pregnant Women and Children Under Five Years in Abi Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
2
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.