Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

A Simple Visual Model to Compare Existing Front-of-pack Nutrient Profiling Schemes

Daphne Van Der Bend, Joost Van Dieren, Marta De Vasconcelos Marques, Nick L. W. Wezenbeek, Niki Kostareli, Patricia Guerreiro Rodrigues, Elisabeth H. M. Temme, Susanne Westenbrink, Hans Verhagen

European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety · pp. 429–534 · Published 20 Jul 2014

10.9734/EJNFS/2014/10305

Abstract

Nutrient profiling is an important tool for governments, non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) and for the food industry, to help consumers make healthier food choices. Multiple nutrient profiling systems (NPS) have been introduced worldwide. There is, however, no agreement on the use of a single NPS in leading regions like the USA and Europe. In 2008, the Arrow Model of Verhagen and van den Bergwas created to illustrate and compare characteristics of existing NPS. Recent developments in nutrient profiling give rise to the need for an updated Model. The present study aims to develop a comprehensive model, which can be used to explain and compare various front-of-pack nutrient profiling systems (FOP-NPS). An extensive literature research was conducted to obtain an overview of existing FOP-NPS worldwide. Only FOP-NPS that are currently in use, focus on health-related product aspects and target the general population (adults and children) were included. The Funnel Model was developed based on the analysis of 40 existing FOP-NPS and expert interviews. This Model illustrates different FOP-NPS and allows comparison among them. The Funnel Model includes several new characteristics compared to the Arrow Model. Numerous ingredients and four new characteristics were added to the Funnel Model: directivity, type of institution initiating the system, purpose and utilization. Several other characteristics were expanded with new elements. The Funnel Model also has a new visual presentation which is useful to clearly explain and compare FOP-NPS.

Nutrient profiling visual model funnel model front-of-pack labeling.

References (30)

  1. 1 The Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: process, product and policy implications [DOI]
  2. 2 Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score [DOI]
  3. 3 Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market [DOI]
  4. 4 Healthy lifestyles in Europe: prevention of obesity and type II diabetes by diet and physical activity [DOI]
  5. 5 Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand [DOI]
  6. 6 Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: A consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling [DOI]
  7. 7 Facts Up Front Versus Traffic Light Food Labels [DOI]
  8. 8 Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the International Choices Programme [DOI]
  9. 9 Performance characteristics of NuVal and the Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI) [DOI]
  10. 10 Development and Implementation of the Guiding Stars Nutrition Guidance Program [DOI]
  11. 11 Front-of-pack nutrition labelling [DOI]
  12. 12 A method to improve the nutritional quality of foods and beverages based on dietary recommendations [DOI]
  13. 13 Dietary Energy Density in Relation to Subsequent Changes of Weight and Waist Circumference in European Men and Women [DOI]
  14. 14 Associations of Children’s Appetitive Traits with Weight and Dietary Behaviours in the Context of General Parenting [DOI]
  15. 15 Nutrient profiling schemes: overview and comparative analysis [DOI]
  16. 16 Examination of front-of-package nutrition rating systems and symbols: Phase I report.
  17. 17 Composite Index for Aggregating Nutrient Density Using Food Labels: Ratio of Recommended to Restricted Food Components [DOI]
  18. 18 The Choices programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy.
  19. 19 A simple visual model to compare existing nutrient profiling schemes [DOI]
  20. 20 Comparison of different nutrient profiling schemes to a new reference method using dietary surveys [DOI]
  21. 21 A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap® [DOI]
  22. 22 The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada's Health Check food information program: modelling program effects on consumer behaviour and dietary practices. [DOI]
  23. 23 Food products qualifying for and carrying front-of-pack symbols: a cross-sectional study examining a manufacturer led and a non-profit organization led program [DOI]
  24. 24 Awareness and use of the Heart Symbol by Finnish consumers [DOI]
  25. 25 Dietary guidelines in singapore.
  26. 26 Policy research for front of package nutrition labeling: Environmental scan and literature review
  27. 27 The Heart symbol: a new food labelling system in Finland [DOI]
  28. 28 The FoodProfiler, a nutrient profiling system to restrict the use of nutrition and health claims to foods with desirable nutrient profiles [DOI]
  29. 29 Facts-Up-Front Versus Traffic-Light Food Labels: A Randomized Controlled Trial [DOI]
  30. 30 Nutrient profile labelling: consumers’ perceptions in Germany and Belgium [DOI]

Cited by 30

Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database

Urška Pivk Kupirovič, Hristo Hristov, Maša Hribar · Foods · 2020

The influence of a front-of-pack nutrition label on product reformulation: A ten-year evaluation of the Dutch Choices programme

Daphne L.M. van der Bend, Léon Jansen, Gerben van der Velde · Food Chemistry: X · 2020

A vision on the ‘foodture’ role of dietary exposure sciences in the interplay between food safety and nutrition

Maryam Zare Jeddi, Polly E. Boon, Francesco Cubadda · Trends in Food Science & Technology · 2022

The combined effect of front-of-pack nutrition labels and health claims on consumers’ evaluation of food products

Zenobia Talati, Simone Pettigrew, Clare Hughes · Food Quality and Preference · 2016

Food Choice Under Five Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Conditions: An Experimental Study Across 12 Countries

Zenobia Talati, Manon Egnell, Serge Hercberg · American Journal of Public Health · 2019

Differences and Similarities between Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels in Europe: A Comparison of Functional and Visual Aspects

Daphne L. M. van der Bend, Lauren Lissner · Nutrients · 2019

Dietitians' perceptions of the healthiness of packaged food

Rachael L. Thurecht, Fiona E. Pelly, Sheri L. Cooper · Appetite · 2018

Front of package symbols as a tool to promote healthier food choices in Slovenia: Accompanying explanatory claim can considerably influence the consumer's preferences

Krista Miklavec, Igor Pravst, Monique M. Raats · Food Research International · 2016

Accentuating the Interrelation between Consumer Intention and Healthy Packaged Food Selection during COVID-19: A Case Study of Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Zafar, Adnan Maqbool, Lucian-Ionel Cioca · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2021

Consumers’ Exposure to Nutrition and Health Claims on Pre-Packed Foods: Use of Sales Weighting for Assessing the Food Supply in Slovenia

Igor Pravst, Anita Kušar · Nutrients · 2015

Showing 10 of 30 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

53

Page views

0

PDF downloads

33

Outbound clicks

30

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.