A Comprehensive Review on Biomarkers for Osteoarthritis: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Insights
Ngozi Amanze, Oluwaseun Abayomi Oguntuase, Adetola Mowo-wale, Roshan Goswami, Luis Fernando Jimenez Cepeda, Ehimwenma Norense Osahon, Hafsa Aziz, Maryam Nour, Uzoamaka Amara Ogbu, Genesis Marie Muñoz, Eke Nwanne Okafor, Onyeka Chukwudalu Ekwebene, Vimla Devi, Frederick Ferguson, Ayodele Paul Ogunro
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 195–207 · Published 31 Oct 2024
10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i115630Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of biomarkers in osteoarthritis (OA) management, focusing on their diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility. The review also assesses the potential of multi-marker models that integrate clinical and demographic data, and explores the relationships between OA and other systemic conditions. Methods: A search of electronic databases comprising PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted, following the PRISMA guidelines, to identify relevant studies that discuss the role of biomarkers in OA. Special attention was given to studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and therapeutic implications of these molecular indicators. Results: Of the 736 studies identified, a total of 8 were included. Numerous biomarkers such as C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II (u-CTX-II), serum cartilage oligomeric protein (COMP), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity troponins T and I (hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI) have been explored for their potential role in cartilage degradation and disease progression in osteoarthritis (OA). These biomarkers, often associated with collagen and aggrecan metabolism in joint tissues, have been investigated for their diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and therapeutic implications. Despite these efforts, no individual biomarker has yet achieved the level of reliability and specificity required for individualized diagnosis or prognosis. Conclusion: Biomarkers hold substantial promise in advancing our understanding and management of OA, but their individual application remains limited. A key limitation of this review is the small number of studies included, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Integrated multi-marker models offer a more nuanced and effective risk assessment and could serve as a basis for individualized management strategies. The findings suggest that future research should focus on refining multi-marker models, exploring novel biomarkers, and elucidating the systemic implications of OA. Additionally, larger and more comprehensive studies are needed to validate these biomarkers' clinical utility.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Maternal Age and Congenital Anomalies among Newborns in a Tertiary Health Facility in Benue State, North Central Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Review of the Current Methods in Clinical Practice — shares topic coverage
- Skeletal Dysplasia: Approach to Simplify Diagnosis, Looking for Radiographic Clue Signs — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Radiology on the Early Identification of Waterhouse-friderichsen Syndrome: A Case Study — shares topic coverage
- The Impact of Genexpert MTB/RIF Technology on the Minimization of Tuberculosis: A Review of Literature — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.