Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Effect of Different Frying Methods on Cooking Yield, Tenderness and Sensory Properties of Chicken Breast Meat

S. U. Alugwu, T. M. Okonkwo, M. O. Ngadi

Asian Food Science Journal · pp. 1–14 · Published 11 Aug 2022

10.9734/afsj/2022/v21i1030469

Abstract

This paper focused on the effect of different frying methods on the quality of chicken breast meat. Fresh boned broiler chicken breast meat samples were purchased, frozen, sliced into dimensions. These samples were cooked by air frying (AF) and deep fat frying (DF) methods at 170°C, 180°C and 190°C for 4, 8, 12- and 16-min. Cooking yield and loss were assessed by weight changes before and after frying and tenderness changes were determined by measuring the compression force using instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA). The sensory acceptance and preferences were conducted on the samples by panel of judges. Cooking yield of fried chicken breast meat decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing frying temperature and time. Air fried (AF) samples had higher mean cooking yield value of 59.26 % than DF method sample of 50.00%. Samples fried at lower frying times had significantly (p < 0.05) higher cooking yield compared with longer frying times. Cooking loss increased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing frying temperature and time. Samples fried with hot air adopting AF method had lower average cooking loss (40.20%), fat content (6.62 %) and higher compression force (hardness) value (12.39 kg/F) than samples fried by DF method which had higher cooking loss (49.47 %) and lower compression force or hardness (12.18 kg/F) and higher fat content (11.88 %). Samples fried for 4 min had significantly (p < 0.05) the least value in cooking loss and tenderness, but 8 min fried samples had better sensory attributes than 4 min fried samples, which were pinkish colour in appearance and unappetizing to consumers. Air frying method with the best tenderness value (20.43 ± 1.15 Kg/F), while deep fat frying method-produced samples with its best tenderness value (18.89 ± 0.70 Kg/ F) at 170°C for 16 min. Sensory evaluation showed that DF products were moderately crispy (7.19) compared to AF products, which were slightly crispy (5.45). The interaction effect of frying method, frying temperature and frying time was significant for cooking yield, loss and tenderness. However, the overall interaction (frying method x frying temperature x frying time) was found to be significant in coking yield and loss, but not significant in tenderness.

Chicken breast cooking yield cooking loss tenderness frying

Cited by 14

Formulation and Shelf-Life Evaluation of Melon ( Citrullus lanatus ) Seed-Based and Chicken ( Gallus gallus domesticus , COBB 500) Sausages

Desdemona Nji, Etape Dielle, Tiencheu Bernard · Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences · 2026

Effect of Soybean Flour on the Physicochemical Properties, Minerals Composition, and Sensory Quality of Beef Sausage

Behailu Bisenebit Mossie, Tadlo Yitayew Atlog, Yeshambel Dagnaw Alefew · Applied Food Research · 2025

KUALITAS FISIK DENDENG KAMBING YANG DITAMBAHKAN TEPUNG MAGGOT BLACK SOLDIER FLY DENGAN KONSENTRASI BERBEDA

Teya Prasetyo Putri, Dicky Tri Utama, Y. A. Hidayati · Agrinimal Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Tanaman · 2025

Nutritional Quality of Sempol with Different Meat Variants

A. Syah, L. Radiati, A. Susilo · Asian Food Science Journal · 2022

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

14

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.