An Opinion Regarding Equivalence Testing for Evaluating Measurement Agreement
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 1–4 · Published 13 Sep 2019
10.9734/jsrr/2019/v24i530163Abstract
The novel statistical approach ‘equivalence testing’ has been proposed in order to statistically examine agreement between different physical activity measures. By using this method, researchers argued that it is possible to determine whether a method is significantly equivalent to another method. Recently, equivalence testing was supported with the use of 90% confidence interval, obtained from a mixed ANOVA, which I believe is a more robust approach. This paper further discusses the use of this method in comparison to a more well-established statistical analysis (i.e. mixed design ANOVA), as well as various limitations and arbitrary assumptions in order to perform this analysis. The paper concludes with some remarks and considerations for future use in similar approaches.
Cited by 4
Angela Uphill, Kristina L. Kendall, A. Fogarty · European Journal of Sport Science · 2024
K. Boadu, Michael Ansong, K. A. Afrifah · Journal of Natural Fibers · 2020
Gabriel M. Marete, V. Shikuku, J. Lalah · Environmental Monitoring & Assessment · 2020
B. N. Nfornkah, R. Kaam, T. Martin · 2020
Related research
- Fetal Outcome Evaluation in High-risk Term Pregnancy Using Biophysical Profile at a Tertiary Hospital in Anambra State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Fast Graphs of Statistical Distributions Using R — shares topic coverage
- Variance and Time Series Analysis of Democracy Index — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
4
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.