Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Investigation of Charcoal Production in Gwer West and Gwer East Local Government Areas of Benue State, Nigeria

D. O. Ekhuemelo, J. I. Tsembe, J. I. Amonum

Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology · pp. 1–13 · Published 13 Jun 2017

10.9734/AJEE/2017/34362

Abstract

This study assessed charcoal production in Gwer west and Gwer east Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Benue State, Nigeria. It was aimed at to identifying charcoal producing villages, preferred wood species used, market channels, awareness of the implication of environmental and socio-economic benefits of charcoal production. Snowball sampling technique was used to identify charcoal producing villages. Mult-stage sampling technique was employed to select respondents for data collection. Five villages were randomly selected and visited in each LGAs, in each village, five charcoal producers were chosen. 150 copies of semi-structured questionnaire were used in the two LGAs. Data collected were analyzed with descriptive statistics and one way ANOVA. Results show that there were more male than female in charcoal production business. In Gwer east, preferred wood species for charcoal production were in the order of Prosopis africana (33%) >Khaya senegalensis (27%) >Terminelia avicenniodes (20%) > vitellaria paradoxa (13%) > Burkia africana (7%). In Gwer west, the order of wood preference was Prosopis africana (29%) >Anogeissus leiocarpus (24%) >Burkia africana (19%) >Afzelia africana (14%) >Vitellaria paradoxa (9%) >Erythrophleum suaveolens (5%). In Gwer west LGA, Aondoana village had highest mean of 24.30±13.83 charcoal production while in Gwer East LGA, Taraku had highest mean (11.10±7.84). Number of charcoal producers in the two LGAs were not significant (p<0.05). In Gwer west, charcoal producers in Aondoana village had highest (32%) earnings of between N 201,000 - N 250,000 monthly and highest employees (32.42%). Whereas, in Gwer west LGA, Taraku charcoal producers highest earning was between N 161,000 - N 200,000 monthly and also had highest employee of  31%. There is no significant difference (p<0.05) in the presence of market in the LGAs. The highest percentage earnings in Gwer west and In Gwer east was used for marring (39%, 37%) beside others. Perceived environmental problems by respondents were climate change (30%)>soil erosion (25%) loss of watershed (20%)>loss of habitat (15%) >extinction of plant species (10%) >land dispute (5%). It was concluded that as charcoal production has both positive and negative impact on the producers, inhabitants and the environment, efforts should be made mitigate the negative effects.  

Charcoal earning Gwer west Gwer east wood species

Cited by 5

Evaluation of Charcoal Usage and Its Influence on Deforestation in Makurdi Metropolis Benue State, Nigeria

Obed Kohol Niambe, Emmanuella Nguevese Gbaa, Ruth Seember Niambe · American Journal of Environment and Climate · 2024

Assessment of Charcoal Production and Its Impact on Deforestation and Environment in Borgu Local Government Area of Niger State, Nigeria

O. A. Adeniji, A. Ibrahim, D. Joshua · Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management · 2022

Thermal and mechanical characteristics of local firewood species and resulting charcoal produced by slow pyrolysis

M. Lubwama, V. A. Yiga, Ivan Ssempijja · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · 2021

Climate Change Effects: Insights from Agroforestry Farmers in GwerEast, Benue State, Nigeria

David Ekhuemelo, Aperaga Ushahemba, Grace Dachung · Journal of Natural Resources and Farming · 2025

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

5

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.