Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Correlation between Ingestive Behavior and Digestibility Coefficients of Supplemented Grazing Steers, with or without Addition of Propolis Extract (LLOS®)

Anderson Silva, Robério Silva, Gleidson de Carvalho, Fabiano da Silva, Túlio Lins, Lúcia Zeoula, Selma Franco, Ana Paula Silva, Venício Carvalho, George Abreu

Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology · pp. 1–12 · Published 28 May 2015

10.9734/JABB/2015/13846

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between ingestive behavior and apparent digestibility of grazing cattle supplemented with or without propolis extract (LLOS®), during the rainy season. Thirty-two uncastrated crossbred steers (269±4.92 kg) with an average age of 20 months were used in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments, with 8 repetitions. Two levels of supplementation were used (0.3 and 0.6% of body weight [BW], on a dry matter [DM] basis), with or without the addition of propolis extract (LLOS®). In treatments with propolis extract (LLOS®), the extract was added daily at 2 g/kg DM supplement. The significance of the correlation coefficient was tested using the "t" test at 5% probability. The parameters evaluated were: Apparent digestibility and ingestive behavior. The digestibility coefficients, except for crude protein and non-fibrous carbohydrates, showed a positive correlation with the time the animals spent feeding at the trough. The digestibility of total dry matter, organic matter, total carbohydrates and crude protein showed a positive correlation with feed efficiency of crude protein (CPFE) (P<0.05). The feed efficiency of total carbohydrates showed a positive (P<0.05), weak correlation only with the digestibility coefficient of protein. The correlations found in this study allow us to understand, after ingesting the feed and during digestion, the behavioral alterations of animals, adapting to changes in the diets.

Feed efficiency rumination efficiency ethology LIPE® supplementation

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.