Cost-benefit Analysis of Different Agroforestry Systems and Practices of Kaharole Upazila of Dinajpur District, Bangladesh
M. S. Rahman, P. R. Roy, M. M. Ali, M. S. Bari, I. J. Sarmin, M. A. Rahman
South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics · pp. 87–97 · Published 15 Dec 2020
10.9734/sajsse/2020/v8i430221Abstract
A study was carried out to evaluate the costs and benefits of three agroforestry systems like homestead, cropland and orchard agroforestry of Kaharole Upazila under Dinajpur district of Bangladesh. An extensive field survey and measurements were conducted during July 2017 to January 2018 at different unions and villages of Kaharole upazila. A multistage random sampling procedure was followed in this study to select the survey area. A pre-structured questionnaire was used for collecting the benefits and costs data. A total of 60 agroforestry practices including 20 homesteads, 20 orchards and 20 croplands were evaluated for cost and benefit analysis. Initial three years costs and income data were collected from the field survey. A projection of seven years cost and income was also produced using regression model. Results of the production cost analysis showed that significantly maximum production cost was in orchard agroforestry system (Tk. 98987 per ha.) followed by cropland (Tk. 90238 per ha.) and minimum in homestead system (Tk. 10854 per ha.) in the 1st year. But production cost decreasing trend was recorded in the successive years in all the systems. In case of gross income analysis showed that though initial income was significantly lower in orchard agroforestry followed by cropland and homestead but after tenth year higher income was found in orchard agroforestry system (Tk. 564758 per ha.) followed by cropland (Tk. 251914 per ha) and homestead (Tk.234234 per ha) agroforestry system. However, the net income indicated that orchard agroforestry system was financially more profitable than cropland and homestead agroforestry systems, but the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was higher in homestead as well as cropland agroforestry systems and lower in orchard agroforestry system. On the other hand guava based agroforestry practice was more lucrative than all other practices. In spite of higher BCR of homestead agroforestry, farmers in the study area widely practiced the orchard agroforestry. It appears that the farmers’ decision regarding what kind of land use they will adopt depends not on the BCR, but largely on the net amount of income that they earn.
Cited by 6
M.M. Ali, M.S. Bari, M.T. Rahman · Heliyon · 2024
M.M. Ali, M.S. Bari, M.A. Hanif · Nature-Based Solutions · 2024
Osato Itohan Oriekhoe, Olawale Adisa, Bamidele Segun Ilugbusi · International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences · 2024
Muhammad Ziaul Hoque, Minhaz Ahmed, Sharif Ahmed · Agroforestry Systems · 2025
ASIF RAIHAN · Asian Journal of Forestry · 2023
Shalini Dhyani, Indu K Murthy, Rakesh Kadaverugu · Forests · 2021
Related research
- Resource-use Efficiency in Small Scale Broiler Production in Owerri Municipal Council of Imo State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Homestead Agroforestry Systems Practiced at Kamalganj Upazila of Moulvibazar District in Bangladesh — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Homestead Agroforestry on Socio-economic Condition of the Respondents at Kamalganj Upazila of Moulvibazar District in Bangladesh — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
6
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.