An Ethical Review of Experimental Philosophy on Robin Hood Activities: A Comparative Analysis
Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences · pp. 75–90 · Published 8 Sep 2022
10.9734/arjass/2022/v18i330344Abstract
Experimental philosophy is a modern philosophical movement that uses systematic inquiry to emphasize philosophy. This means that psychology-related methods (experiments, statistical analysis, studies on development, reaction time studies, patient studies,) are generally used by experimental philosophers, although generally used to solve philosophical problems. Additionally, the primary goal of experimental philosophy is to set the public's view against the philosopher's view of the subject being studied. In this essay, I discuss the difference between philosophers and non-philosophers regarding the ethics of Robin Hood's activity. The first goal of this study is to determine what common people think about the morality of Robin Hood's deeds. 2. To identify the contrasts between philosophers and common people. In this study, an online survey method was employed. By contrasting the views of philosophers and common people on the issue of whether Robin Hood's activities are moral, experimental philosophy highlights the significance of non-philosophers opinions in philosophy. Let's examine Robin Hood's philosophy and experimental philosophy separately before getting into the specifics.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Awareness of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Medical Students and Surgical Trainees Regarding Surgical Informed Consent: A Cross-sectional Multi-centric Study from Northern India — shares topic coverage
- Is Mercy Killing Right or Wrong? – Opinions of Clinical Students in Three Nigerian Tertiary Schools — shares topic coverage
- Scientific Communication on Artificial Intelligence: The Question of the Social Status of the Biodroid — shares topic coverage
- Unveiling the Essence of ‘Doctorateness’ in Ph.D. Mentorship: Navigating the Humanity amidst Academic Pursuits in Academia — shares topic coverage
- Medicine and Social Media – Ethical Challenges of the 21st Century — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.