Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Brazilian Women without Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes: Ten-Year Survival and Prognostic Factors
Ana Lucia Amaral Eisenberg, Isabella Vitral Pinto, Sérgio Koifman
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 880–896 · Published 11 Mar 2013
10.9734/BJMMR/2013/2544Abstract
Aims: To determine the 10-year overall survival (OS) in triple-negative (TN) and non-TN breast cancer (BC) patients, and to identify associated independent prognostic factors. Study Design: Descriptive and survival. Place and Duration of Study: Pathology Division at National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 1992-1996. Methodology: Population: 348 women patients with invasive ductal carcinoma without lymph node metastasis. Analyzed variables: age, treatment, surgery type, tumor size, skin involvement, histological grade, vascular invasion, estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER-2, Ki-67 and p53. Statistical analysis performed: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log rank test, and multivariate Cox models. Results: 27% of the studied women were categorized as TNBC and 73%, as non-TNBC. The former showed higher frequency of age <50yr, preoperative chemotherapy, tumors >5cm, high grade, vascular invasion, and positive p53, (P=.05). Ten-year OS among TNBC patients was 61.6%, and 70.1% for non-TNBC patients (P=.058). Survival was higher in TNBC patients treated with partial surgeries, tumors ≤5cm, without skin involvement, low grade, and Ki-67 negative (P=.05). Among non-TNBC patients, higher survival was observed in patients without skin involvement, low grade, no vascular invasion, and p53 negative, (P=.05). Cox modelization showed a 2-fold higher death risk for TNBC patients aged ≥50yr, about 2.5-fold higher risk related to preoperative chemotherapy, high grade tumor and skin involvement, and a 3.0-fold higher risk for Ki-67 positive patients (P=.05). For non-TNBC patients, a 2.0-fold increased death risk was verified in patients with skin involvement and vascular invasion (P=.05). Conclusion: TNBC patients showed a worse prognosis and survival when compared to non-TNBC patients. A worse 10-yr survival among TNBC patients was associated with age ≥50yr, preoperative chemotherapy, skin involvement, high histological grade, and Ki-67 positive tumors. For non-TNBC patients, the worst prognosis was related to skin involvement and vascular invasion. These predictors need to be further validating by other studies.
Cited by 5
Zaida Morante, Yomali Ferreyra, Joseph A. Pinto · Frontiers in Oncology · 2023
Joseph A Pinto, Jhajaira Araujo, Nadezhda K Cardenas · npj Genomic Medicine · 2016
Homero Gonçalves, Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra, Jane Rocha Duarte Cintra · Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology · 2018
Alejandra Zevallos, Leny Bravo, Denisse Bretel · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · 2020
Vívian Assis Fayer, Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra, Jane Rocha Duarte Cintra · Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia · 2016
Related research
- Reproductive Factors Associated with the Risk of Breast Cancer among Malaysian Women: A Multi-Centre Case-Control Study — shares topic coverage
- Factors Predicting the Utilization of Breast Cancer Screening Services among Women Working in a Private University in Ogun State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Breast Cancer Screening Trend Year 2017 among South-Western Nigeria Female Residents — shares topic coverage
- Complementary Medicine Intervention in Breast Cancer Patients with Pain — shares topic coverage
- Breast Cancer Knowledge and Mammography Uptake among Women Aged 40 Years and Above in Calabar Municipality, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
18
Page views
0
PDF downloads
5
Outbound clicks
5
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.