Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

A Comparison of the Pearson, Spearman Rank and Kendall Tau Correlation Coefficients Using Quantitative Variables

Essam F. El-Hashash, Raga Hassan Ali Shiekh

Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics · pp. 36–48 · Published 18 Oct 2022

10.9734/ajpas/2022/v20i3425

Abstract

In all fields and branches of sciences especially statistics, the correlation coefficient is one of the most often used statistical measures. This study has been carried out for comparing the performances of the Pearson (), Spearman's Rank (), and Kendall’s Tau () correlation coefficients under three sample sizes based on the data of quantitative variables of cotton. Descriptive statistics showed the presence of genetic variability for the cotton studied traits in this study. The quantity, significance, and direction of the correlation calculated by  differed in some cases from the other methods under the three sample sizes, opposite is true for  and . The highest number of positive correlations among studied traits were by  under N = 30 observations, and by   and  under N = 20 observations. The studied correlation methods performances by Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) revealed that  and  appear to be a good estimator of correlation because they have the lowest values of RMSE. The highest values of RMSE were observed by  and   under N=10 and N=20, and by   under N=30. The results of PCA could be useful and appropriate in this study, in which the PCA1 had highly positively correlated with the three studied methods for N=10 observations, and with  and  for N=20 observations.

Correlation pearson Spearman's Rank Kendall’s Tau RMSE PCA

Cited by 107

Supercomputing Centers and Their Impact on Research Output: Multinational Comparison

Sh. A. Sargsyan, H. H. Baghdasaryan, H. V. Astsatryan · Physics of Particles and Nuclei · 2025

Assessing molecular docking tools: understanding drug discovery and design

Harendar Kumar Nivatya, Anjali Singh, Nitin Kumar · Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2025

Application of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling for design of antifriction binary PEEK-based nanocomposites

Changjun He, Dmitry Y. Stepanov, Dmitry G. Buslovich · Tribology International · 2026

Prediction of urban water consumption using AI-based multiple modeling based on deep learning

H. Sadeghi, S. Sadeghfam, A. Sharafati · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · 2025

Analysis of Electrochemical Impedance Spectra for the Sensitive Detection of Sucrose and Maltose Additives in Honey

Meruga Udaya, M. Ghanashyam Krishna, Samrat L. Sabat · SN Computer Science · 2025

Guess Who? Identifying individuals from their brain natural frequency fingerprints

Lydia Arana, Juan José Herrera-Morueco, Javier Santonja · 2025

Normalized least dependent difference: a method in solving incorrectly identified monotonic linearity relationship in linear regression

Herrick Han Lin Yeap, Le Ying Lim, Michelle Chee Ern Lim · International Workshop on Advanced Imaging Technology (IWAIT) 2025 · 2025

Showing 20 of 107 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

107

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.