Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Standardization of Formulation and Application Approaches for Field Implementation of EPNs

Babita Kumari, Anil Kumar, Sujata, Deepak Mourya

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 837–846 · Published 24 Feb 2024

10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i23997

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) live parasitically inside the infected insect host, and so they are termed as endoparasitic. They infect different types of insect living in the soil like the larval forms of moths, butterflies and beetles as well as adult forms of beetles, grasshoppers and crickets. The present experiment was conducted under both laboratory and field conditions at CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar. Two most virulent strains of EPNs, Metarhabditis amsactae strain HAR-St-II and HAR-Ht-III were taken and their formulations were standardized using six different media i.e. cadaver based formulation, water, alginate gel, foam chips, clay chips and water dispersible granules. Among these formulations, cadaver based formulation was found to be best. Maximum numbers of active IJs after 90 days were obtained from this formulation were 3370 and 2728 /Petri plate in strain HAR-St-II and HAR- Ht-III of M. amsactae, respectively. Further this, experiment was conducted at field level for EPNs suspension was standardized using different size of nozzle opening i.e. 25 µm, 50 µm, 75 µm and 100 µm on knapsack sprayer. Spodoptera litura was selected as a test insect in okra crop for foliar application of EPNs and results revealed that 100 µm nozzle opening size gave maximum larval mortality of S. litura. Per cent mortality of S. litura was increased with increase in size of nozzle and period of observation

Entomopathogenic nematodes Spodoptera litura formulation nozzle size mortality

Cited by 1

Green pest management: the role of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) against armyworms, Spodoptera Guenée (lepidoptera: noctuidae)

Neelam Thakur, Simranjeet Kaur, Kanwaljit Kaur Ahluwalia · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection · 2025

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

28

Page views

0

PDF downloads

3

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.