Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Sex Differences in Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients with Low and Intermediate Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease

Hesham Mohamed El-Shazly, Raghda Ghonimy El-Sheikh, Mahmoud Zaky El-Amrosy, Ehab Abd-El-Whab Hamdy, Ikram Sadek Saed

Cardiology and Angiology: An International Journal · pp. 323–335 · Published 21 Sep 2022

10.9734/ca/2022/v11i4287

Abstract

Background: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography has become one of the hot spots in cardiovascular imaging technology. Many of the sex-based research have shown that women have different pathogenesis, clinical presentation and complication related to coronary artery disease (CAD) as compared to the males. The aim of this study investigated the relationship between gender and coronary artery calcium (CAC) in patients with chest discomfort with low and intermediate pretest probability of CAD who underwent Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and referrals by gender for subsequent invasive coronary angiography and revascularization. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 200 patients suspected to have coronary artery disease, negative or equivocal stress tests, with no prior known coronary artery disease (CAD), intermediate pretest probability for CAD according to the scoring method of (15-65 points), and Low likelihood for CAD (< 15 points). Patients were divided into two groups according to gender and were followed up. All patients underwent Full history taking, full clinical examination, routine laboratory investigation, resting and exercise ECG, echocardiography, CT coronary angiography and invasive Coronary angiography. Results: Patients with mild calcium score level were significantly higher in no CAD group than CAD group (p <0.001) and patients with high calcium score were significantly higher in CAD group than no CAD group (p <0.001). In univariate regression analysis age, typical chest pain, obesity, coronary Ca score, and hyperlipidemia are independent predictors for CAD in females. In multivariate regression analysis, age, typical chest pain, hypertension, and coronary Ca score are predictors for CAD in males. Coronary calcium score is a good predicator for CAD (AUC =0.901, 95% CI =0.851-0.938, p value <0.001). At cut off value > 101, it has 70.97% sensitivity, 90.79% specificity, 92.6% PPV, and 65.7% NPV. Moreover, it is a good predicator for CAD in females (AUC =0.894, 95% CI =0.823 – 0.944, p value <0.001). At cut off value > 101, it has 60.71% sensitivity, 91.67% specificity, 87.2% PPV, and 71.4% NPV. Conclusions: In patients with chest discomfort with low and intermediate pretest probability of CAD who underwent CCTA and subsequent invasive coronary angiography and revascularization, female patients had lower age, hypertension, pretest probability score, calcium score, atypical angina, nonanginal chest pain and obstructive CAD but had higher BMI, typical angina than males’ group. In females, coronary calcium score is a good predicator for CAD. When its level exceeds 100, it has 60.71% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity. In addition, it was found that in females typical chest pain and coronary Ca score are predictors for CAD and in males, age, typical chest pain, hypertension, and coronary Ca score are predictors for CAD.

Sex differences computed tomographic angiography pretest probability coronary artery disease

References (25)

  1. 1 Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography [DOI]
  2. 2 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines [DOI]
  3. 3 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias [DOI]
  4. 4 Coronary Calcium as a Predictor of Coronary Events in Four Racial or Ethnic Groups [DOI]
  5. 5 Definition, Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes, Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome [DOI]
  6. 6 Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts [DOI]
  7. 7 Tobacco Product Use Among Adults — United States, 2015 [DOI]
  8. 8 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias [DOI]
  9. 9 Left ventricular global systolic function assessment by echocardiography [DOI]
  10. 10 Assessment of Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Score Using Contrast-Enhanced CT Coronary Angiography [DOI]
  11. 11 The Role of Gender in the Importance of Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease [DOI]
  12. 12 Stable Angina Pectoris: Head-to-Head Comparison of Prognostic Value of Cardiac CT and Exercise Testing [DOI]
  13. 13 Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts [DOI]
  14. 14 Differences in coronary artery disease and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in women and men [DOI]
  15. 15 Gender differences in the risk of coronary artery disease in iran.
  16. 16 Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Calcium Score Less than 100 in Excluding Coronary Artery Disease [DOI]
  17. 17 Impact of Age and Sex on Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in a Healthy Asian Population [DOI]
  18. 18 Coronary Calcium Score for the Prediction of Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Ischemic Stroke [DOI]
  19. 19 Sex-related disparities in obstructive coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, and mortality in adults with cardiac arrest [DOI]
  20. 20 Distributions and burden of coronary calcium in asymptomatic Saudi patients referred to computed tomography [DOI]
  21. 21 Diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography using 64-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease [DOI]
  22. 22 Assessment of Cardiac Function by Echocardiography [DOI]
  23. 23 Impact of age and sex on subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in a healthy asian population [DOI]
  24. 24 Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease Patients [DOI]
  25. 25 Coronary CTA: Stenosis classification and quantification, including automated measures [DOI]

Cited by 2

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

58

Page views

0

PDF downloads

30

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.