Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Selection of Alternaria Fungi Control Treatments in a Citrus Grove through the Lens of the Electre Technique: A Case Study in San Luis Potosi, Mexico

Juan Manuel Izar- Landeta, Raul Hernandez- Molinar

Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 122–130 · Published 17 Oct 2020

10.9734/jeai/2020/v42i830578

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five control treatments (pesticides) for an Alternaria fungi variety in a citrus grove in Mexico. Study Design: Field applications of pesticides were used to combat an infestation of the Alternaria fungus. Place and Duration of the Study: The study took place in an orange citrus grove in Ciudad Fernandez, San Luis Potosí, Mexico, from October 2018 to August 2019. Methodology: Field trials with five control treatments were applied to randomly selected rows of infected orange trees. The assessment of treatments was carried out using the multi-criteria decision method (MCDM) known as ELECTRE with six evaluation criteria: cost, effectiveness, toxicity (e.g., environmental impact), difficulty of preparation, ease of application, and expiration date. Results: The results reveal that the best option to control the fungus of the Alternaria is the use of a biological product based on microorganisms, instead of standard options such as agrochemicals, or synthetic preparations known as “broths.” A sensitivity analysis reveals that the result may be affected by changing the weight of the criteria. Conclusion: The best treatment is the biological product because it is the most effective treatment to control the fungi plague, it is not toxic or expensive, and it does not have a measurable impact on the environment. However, the results are sensitive to changes in the weight of the criteria.

Crop management pesticides multi-criteria decision analysis broths biological product.

Cited by 2

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

25

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.