Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Performance Evaluation of Groundnut Digger in Chhattisgarh, India

Prachi Vaishanav, R. K. Naik, Tejeshwar Kumar, Sourabh Kumar Dewangan

Asian Research Journal of Agriculture · pp. 464–473 · Published 9 Oct 2024

10.9734/arja/2024/v17i4548

Abstract

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), is a significant oilseed crop. It is grown in Chhattisgarh during rabi and kharif seasons, with traditional manual harvesting being labor-intensive and costly. To enhance efficiency, a study evaluated a tractor-operated groundnut digger in Chhattisgarh, focusing on factors such as crop size, shape, depth, spacing, and soil parameters like bulk density, true density, and moisture content. Performance metrics included exposed pod loss, buried pod loss, damaged pod loss, total pod loss, field efficiency, and digging efficiency. In this study found that at a 30° rake angle and 3.5 km h-1 speed, the maximum buried pod loss was 7.37%, exposed pod loss was 9.89%, and total pod loss was 23.79%. Conversely, the digger achieved a high digging efficiency of 96.92% with a 25° rake angle and 2 km h-1 speed. The operational cost was 972.57 Rs h-1, with a breakeven point of 100.42 hours per year and a payback period of 0.91 years. Compared to manual harvesting, which costs 37.5 Rs h-1, the tractor-operated digger significantly reduces time and costs, offering substantial improvements in harvesting efficiency.

Groundnut digger digging efficiency field efficiency pod loss forward speed rake angle

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.